BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7072592)

  • 1. Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements.
    Borow KM; Newburger JW
    Am Heart J; 1982 May; 103(5):879-86. PubMed ID: 7072592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-invasive estimates of aortic root pressures: external subclavian arterial pulse tracing calibrated by oscillometrically determined brachial arterial pressures.
    Aakhus S; Torp H; Haugland T; Hatle L
    Clin Physiol; 1993 Nov; 13(6):573-86. PubMed ID: 8119052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the N-point moving average method for brachial pressure waveform-derived estimation of central aortic systolic pressure.
    Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
    Hypertension; 2014 Apr; 63(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 24420554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of four indirect methods of blood pressure measurement, with hemodynamic correlations.
    Gravlee GP; Brockschmidt JK
    J Clin Monit; 1990 Oct; 6(4):284-98. PubMed ID: 2230858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of central systolic blood pressure using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Cheng HM; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Chen LC; Sung SH; Ding PY; Yu WC; Chen JW; Chen CH
    Hypertens Res; 2010 Jun; 33(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20339373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noninvasive determination of systolic, diastolic and end-systolic blood pressure in neonates, infants and young children: comparison with central aortic pressure measurements.
    Colan SD; Fujii A; Borow KM; MacPherson D; Sanders SP
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):867-70. PubMed ID: 6624679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a noninvasive method to determine arterial pressure and vascular compliance.
    Brinton TJ; Cotter B; Kailasam MT; Brown DL; Chio SS; O'Connor DT; DeMaria AN
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Aug; 80(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 9264426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass: which technique is accurate?
    Thrush DN; Steighner ML; Räsänen J; Vijayanagar R
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1994 Jun; 8(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 8061259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure.
    Weber T; Wassertheurer S; Rammer M; Maurer E; Hametner B; Mayer CC; Kropf J; Eber B
    Hypertension; 2011 Nov; 58(5):825-32. PubMed ID: 21911710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of oscillometric and intraarterial systolic and diastolic blood pressures in lean, overweight, and obese patients.
    Umana E; Ahmed W; Fraley MA; Alpert MA
    Angiology; 2006; 57(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 16444455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of the calibration error in the transfer function-derived central aortic blood pressures.
    Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21850061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Rajani R; Chowienczyk P; Redwood S; Guilcher A; Chambers JB
    J Hypertens; 2008 Dec; 26(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 19008716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radial artery tonometry: moderately accurate but unpredictable technique of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement.
    Weiss BM; Spahn DR; Rahmig H; Rohling R; Pasch T
    Br J Anaesth; 1996 Mar; 76(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 8785142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two generalized transfer functions for measuring central systolic blood pressure by an oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2013 Mar; 27(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 22551938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of sex on the accuracy of oscillometric-derived blood pressures.
    Bhatt SD; Hinderliter AL; Stouffer GA
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2011 Feb; 13(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 21272199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical validation of a suprasystolic brachial cuff-based method for estimating aortic pressure.
    Liang F
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):1053-62. PubMed ID: 24211996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: Comparison of Agreement between Oscillometric and Finger-Cuff Methods.
    Alfano G; Fontana F; Cappelli G
    Nephron; 2017; 136(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 28468005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method.
    Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 22874891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.