These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparative functional effects of chronic ventricular demand and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Yee R; Benditt DG; Kostuk WJ; Ko PT; Purves P; Klein GJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan; 7(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 6199764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The haemodynamic importance of atrioventricular synchrony and rate increase at rest and during exercise. Kristensson BE; Arnman K; Rydén L Eur Heart J; 1985 Sep; 6(9):773-8. PubMed ID: 4076212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of physical work capacity and systolic time intervals with ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Kruse I; Rydén L Br Heart J; 1981 Aug; 46(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 7272123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Respiration-dependent ventricular pacing compared with fixed ventricular and atrial-ventricular synchronous pacing: aerobic and hemodynamic variables. Rossi P; Rognoni G; Occhetta E; Aina F; Prando MD; Plicchi G; Minella M J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 4031276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography. Videen JS; Huang SK; Bazgan ID; Mechling E; Patton DD Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jun; 57(15):1305-8. PubMed ID: 3717030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is DDD pacing superior to VVI,R? A study on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and myocardial oxygen consumption at rest and during exercise. Linde-Edelstam C; Hjemdahl P; Pehrsson SK; Aström H; Nordlander R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Apr; 15(4 Pt 1):425-34. PubMed ID: 1374887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers. McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of sympathoadrenal activity and cardiac performance at rest and during exercise in patients with ventricular demand or atrial synchronous pacing. Pehrsson SK; Hjemdahl P; Nordlander R; Aström H Br Heart J; 1988 Sep; 60(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 3179137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myocardial demands of atrial-triggered versus fixed-rate ventricular pacing in patients with complete heart block. Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK; Aström H; Karlsson J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Sep; 10(5):1154-9. PubMed ID: 2444940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left ventricular function after long-term treatment with ventricular inhibited compared to atrial triggered ventricular pacing. Pehrsson SK; Aström H Acta Med Scand; 1983; 214(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 6660036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block]. Lemke B; Gude J; von Dryander S; Barmeyer J; Braun BE; Krieg M Z Kardiol; 1990 Aug; 79(8):547-56. PubMed ID: 2145704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The effect of changes in stroke volume on QT dispersion during long-term DDD and VVI pacing]. Lelakowski J; Majewski J; Bednarek J; Szczepkowski J; Machejek J Przegl Lek; 2001; 58(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11475854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]