69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 707492)
1. Assuring "detached but passionate investigation and decision": the role of guardians ad litem in Saikewicz-type cases.
Baron CH
Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(2):111-30. PubMed ID: 707492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
Buchanan A
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. After Quinlan: the impact of the Saikewicz decision.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Jul; 43(7):455. PubMed ID: 477310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman.
Baron CH
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint.
Relman AS
Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Saikewicz case sparks interest in living will.
Euthanasia News; 1978; 4(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11664926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics committees in the courts.
Wolf SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun; 16(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 3721842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the matter of Mary Hier.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. After Saikewicz: No-fault death.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Jun; 8(3):16-8. PubMed ID: 669930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Saikewicz: nontreatment decisions for incompetents.
Gamble HF
Linacre Q; 1983 Aug; 50(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 11655586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique.
Gorby JD
Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Judges at the bedside: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10289106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
