69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 707492)
21. Withholding treatment from the retarded: Canadian Psychiatric Association studies legal, medical aspects.
Can Med Assoc J; 1979 Mar; 120(6):716, 718. PubMed ID: 11643499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Letting defective babies die: who decides?
Ellis TS
Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):393-423. PubMed ID: 7102678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Saikewicz decision.
N Engl J Med; 1978 May; 298(21):1208. PubMed ID: 651960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Termination of life support in vegetative states: New York court sets guidelines for private decisions.
Beresford HR
Ann Neurol; 1982 Jan; 11(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 7059124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The courts and the practice of medicine.
Trout ME
J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Oct; 4(9):2. PubMed ID: 1085803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Further reflections on the Saikewicz decision.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Aug; 43(8):527. PubMed ID: 553780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making?
Webster WL
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Death, dying, and the courts: the travesty and tragedy of the Earle Spring case.
Paris JJ
Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 11650518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980).
Lubinsky MS
West New Engl Law Rev; 1980; 2(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 11649558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Recent developments in the law governing medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1988 May; 22(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 11652540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
