These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 707492)
41. Supreme Court decision In respect of a Ward of Court. O'Brien T J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(6):183, 187. PubMed ID: 11657819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Proxy decisionmaking for the terminally ill: the Virginia approach. O'Shaughnessy WJ Va Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 70(6):1269-302. PubMed ID: 11652483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Carroll PR Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Right to die (second of two parts): a set of fact sheets. Society for the Right to Die Conn Med; 1982 May; 46(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 11643762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Rudolfo Torres Conservatee. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 11644499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Saikewicz-ophobia: is it justified? Gibbs RF Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jul; 6(7):4. PubMed ID: 682822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Joseph Saikewicz revisited. Nicolosi GG America (NY); 1978 Apr; 138(14):293. PubMed ID: 11664927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The Dinnerstein decision and "no-code" orders. Baron CH N Engl J Med; 1979 Feb; 300(5):264. PubMed ID: 759878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) and the incapacitated patient: policy suggestions for healthcare ethics committees. Drane JF HEC Forum; 1991; 3(6):309-20. PubMed ID: 10116447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Ethics committees for what? Browne A CMAJ; 1987 Jun; 136(11):1149-51. PubMed ID: 3567776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Assuring "detached but passionate investigation and decision": the role of guardians ad litem in Saikewicz-type cases. Baron CH Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(2):111-30. PubMed ID: 707492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases. Buchanan A Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. After Quinlan: the impact of the Saikewicz decision. Healey JM Conn Med; 1979 Jul; 43(7):455. PubMed ID: 477310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]