These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7075071)

  • 1. Effects of tibial components on load transfer in the upper tibia.
    Reilly D; Walker PS; Ben-Dov M; Ewald FC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 May; (165):273-82. PubMed ID: 7075071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock.
    Brooks PJ; Walker PS; Scott RD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Apr; (184):302-8. PubMed ID: 6705360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study.
    Perillo-Marcone A; Taylor M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of combined knee loadings on posterior cruciate ligament force generation.
    Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JL; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MM; Finerman GA
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Jul; 14(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 8764874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined knee loading states that generate high anterior cruciate ligament forces.
    Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Shepard MF; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
    J Orthop Res; 1995 Nov; 13(6):930-5. PubMed ID: 8544031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strain shielding in proximal tibia of stemmed knee prosthesis: experimental study.
    Completo A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):560-6. PubMed ID: 18036530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculation of tibial loading using strain gauges.
    Funk JR; Crandall JR
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():160-5. PubMed ID: 16817602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation of tibial components of knee prostheses.
    Walker PS; Greene D; Reilly D; Thatcher J; Ben-Dov M; Ewald FC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1981 Feb; 63(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 7462283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The strain distribution in the upper tibia after insertion of two different unicompartmental prostheses.
    Ivarsson I; Gillquist J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jun; (279):194-200. PubMed ID: 1600656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce strain at the proximal tibia.
    Bottlang M; Erne OK; Lacatusu E; Sommers MB; Kessler O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():105-11. PubMed ID: 16456313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does a tensioning device pinned to the tibia improve knee anterior-posterior load-displacement compared to manual tensioning of the graft following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A cadaveric study of two tibial fixation devices.
    Thompson DM; Hull ML; Howell SM
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1832-41. PubMed ID: 16865723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a testing methodology to quantify bone load transfer patterns for multiple stemmed implants in a single bone with an application in the distal ulna.
    Austman RL; Quenneville CE; Beaton BJ; King GJ; Gordon KD; Dunning CE
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):024502. PubMed ID: 18412513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The line of action in the tibia during axial compression of the leg.
    Funk JR; Rudd RW; Kerrigan JR; Crandall JR
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2277-82. PubMed ID: 17141787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Injury tolerance and moment response of the knee joint to combined valgus bending and shear loading.
    Bose D; Bhalla KS; Untaroiu CD; Ivarsson BJ; Crandall JR; Hurwitz S
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031008. PubMed ID: 18532857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty.
    Stern SH; Wills RD; Gilbert JL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):44-52. PubMed ID: 9418620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of bone strain measurements at anatomically relevant sites using surface gauges versus strain gauged bone staples.
    Milgrom C; Finestone A; Hamel A; Mandes V; Burr D; Sharkey N
    J Biomech; 2004 Jun; 37(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 15111084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition.
    Kessler O; Lacatusu E; Sommers MB; Mayr E; Bottlang M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 16554112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An implantable telemetry device to measure intra-articular tibial forces.
    D'Lima DD; Townsend CP; Arms SW; Morris BA; Colwell CW
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 15598457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.