These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7076411)

  • 1. Visual-evoked responses elicited by the onset and offset of sinusoidal gratings: latency, waveform, and topographic characteristics.
    Parker DM; Salzen EA; Lishman JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 May; 22(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 7076411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of the spatial frequency of sinusoidal gratings on amplitude and temporal parameters of visual evoked potentials in man].
    Zislina NN; Fil'chikova LI; Levkovich IuI; Batyr' OIu
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1984; 34(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 6506863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amplitude of the transient visual evoked potential (tVEP) as a function of achromatic and chromatic contrast: contribution of different visual pathways.
    Souza GS; Gomes BD; Lacerda EM; Saito CA; da Silva Filho M; Silveira LC
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 18321403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual evoked response as a function of grating spatial frequency.
    Jones R; Keck MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1978 Jul; 17(7):652-9. PubMed ID: 669894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual evoked potentials to red-green stimulation in schoolchildren.
    Pompe MT; Kranjc BS; Brecelj J
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):447-51. PubMed ID: 16961979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone contrast influence on components of the pattern onset/offset VECP.
    Gomes BD; Souza GS; Saito CA; da Silva Filho M; Rodrigues AR; Ventura DF; Silveira LC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):518-24. PubMed ID: 20883335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human cortical responses to contrast modulations of visual noise.
    Calvert J; Manahilov V; Simpson WA; Parker DM
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2218-30. PubMed ID: 15924937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex.
    Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 16500628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study on the offset responses of simple cells and complex cells in the primary visual cortex of the cat.
    Liang Z; Shen W; Sun C; Shou T
    Neuroscience; 2008 Oct; 156(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 18723081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term voltage-sensitive dye imaging reveals cortical dynamics in behaving monkeys.
    Slovin H; Arieli A; Hildesheim R; Grinvald A
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 88(6):3421-38. PubMed ID: 12466458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual cortex neurons of monkeys and cats: temporal dynamics of the spatial frequency response function.
    Frazor RA; Albrecht DG; Geisler WS; Crane AM
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 91(6):2607-27. PubMed ID: 14960559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial adaptation of the cortical visual evoked potential of the cat.
    Bonds AB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Jun; 25(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 6724833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Split-second sequential selective activation in human secondary visual cortex.
    Kenemans JL; Lijffijt M; Camfferman G; Verbaten MN
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jan; 14(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 11798386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-varying differences in evoked potentials elicited by high versus low spatial frequencies: a topographical and source analysis.
    Boeschoten MA; Kemner C; Kenemans JL; van Engeland H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1956-66. PubMed ID: 15990359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric asymmetry in transient visual evoked potentials induced by the spatial factor of the stimulation.
    Rebai M; Bagot JD; Viggiano MP
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Nov; 23(2):263-78. PubMed ID: 8292329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological correlates of lateral interactions in human visual cortex.
    Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1659-73. PubMed ID: 15136002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Statistical VEP analysis for approximate determination of latency distribution of visually evoked single cortical stimulus responses].
    Emskötter T; Zschocke S
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Jun; 15(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 6432517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-component correlate for lateral collinear interactions in the human visual cortex.
    Sterkin A; Yehezkel O; Bonneh YS; Norcia A; Polat U
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul; 48(15):1641-7. PubMed ID: 18538813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Hoffmann MB; Seufert PS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1723-32. PubMed ID: 15908272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrepancy between reaction time and visual evoked magnetic response latency under priming.
    Hashimoto A; Inui K; Watanabe S; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Mar; 60(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 18177961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.