101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7076447)
1. Directed versus free search for nodules in chest radiographs.
Parker TW; Kelsey CA; Moseley RD; Mettler FA; Garcia JF; Briscoe DE
Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 7076447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chest radiographs obtained with shaped filters: evaluation by observer performance tests.
Kelsey CA; Lane RG; Moseley RD; Mettler FA; Rosenberg RD; Williams AG; Garcia JF; Feldman BS; Boardman RE
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):653-5. PubMed ID: 3704147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs.
Samuel S; Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Toto LC
Radiology; 1995 Mar; 194(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 7862998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation of lung nodules for nodule detection studies.
Sorenson JA; Nelson JA; Niklason LA; Klauber MR
Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(6):490-5. PubMed ID: 7203903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does computer-aided diagnosis for lung tumors change satisfaction of search in chest radiography?
Berbaum KS; Caldwell RT; Schartz KM; Thompson BH; Franken EA
Acad Radiol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):1069-76. PubMed ID: 17707314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can a checklist reduce SOS errors in chest radiography?
Berbaum K; Franken EA; Caldwell RT; Schartz KM
Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 16488841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Viewing another person's eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection.
Litchfield D; Ball LJ; Donovan T; Manning DJ; Crawford T
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):251-62. PubMed ID: 20853985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection improves detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs beyond the support by bone-suppressed images.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Koedam E; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):252-61. PubMed ID: 24635675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs: localized search method based on anatomical classification.
Shiraishi J; Li Q; Suzuki K; Engelmann R; Doi K
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2642-53. PubMed ID: 16898468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of radiologists in detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: effect of rib suppression with a massive-training artificial neural network.
Oda S; Awai K; Suzuki K; Yanaga Y; Funama Y; MacMahon H; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):W397-402. PubMed ID: 19843717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance analysis of a new computer aided detection system for identifying lung nodules on chest radiographs.
Hardie RC; Rogers SK; Wilson T; Rogers A
Med Image Anal; 2008 Jun; 12(3):240-58. PubMed ID: 18178123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lung nodule detection on chest CT: evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system.
Lee IJ; Gamsu G; Czum J; Wu N; Johnson R; Chakrapani S
Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 15968147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Satisfaction of Search in Chest Radiography 2015.
Berbaum KS; Krupinski EA; Schartz KM; Caldwell RT; Madsen MT; Hur S; Laroia AT; Thompson BH; Mullan BF; Franken EA
Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1457-65. PubMed ID: 26363824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided diagnosis for improved detection of lung nodules by use of posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiographs.
Shiraishi J; Li F; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 17178363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 17057066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Global and segmented search for lung nodules of different edge gradients.
Carmody DP; Nodine CF; Kundel HL
Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 7399846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
