121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7076490)
1. Regional health information and evaluation systems: some concepts and thoughts.
Gillings DB; Greenberg BG
Isr J Med Sci; 1982 Mar; 18(3):393-409. PubMed ID: 7076490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lothian Health Board, Data Protection Act, subject access trial.
Laing IB
Med Rec Health Care Inf J; 1987 Nov; 28(4):78-100. PubMed ID: 10285810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Planning and evaluation of regionalized perinatal care: a rural example.
Siegel E; Gillings D; Guild P; Nugent R
Semin Perinatol; 1977 Jul; 1(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 618133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A framework for evaluation of medical information systems.
Turunen P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():611-6. PubMed ID: 14664055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total medical record: an automated system for ancillary services.
Herpok FJ; Hansen JP
J Ambul Care Manage; 1981 May; 4(2):47-8. PubMed ID: 10251113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Stockholm County health care information system.
Zetterblad U; Peterson H
World Hosp; 1980 May; 16(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 10247797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experience with using computers in sanitary-epidemiological stations for automatic control of laboratory data].
Chelnov VM; Vazhnik SV; Zalmover IIu; Pykhtina AI; Plotkin VZ
Gig Sanit; 1989 Jul; (7):65-6. PubMed ID: 2529185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to use management information from the medical record.
Harrington L
Issues Health Care; 1980; 1(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 10255612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Administration of environmental health programmes; a systems view.
Schaefer M
Public Health Pap; 1974; (59):1-242. PubMed ID: 4480104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidentiality of health records in emergency medical services systems.
Campbell BC
Med Rec News; 1975 Jun; 46(3):16-20. PubMed ID: 10238086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Do we have all of the public health information we need in North Carolina?
Kalsbeek WD
N C Med J; 2008; 69(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 18605171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Which health information systems for the evaluation of health actions?].
Migeot V; Ingrand P; Salmi LR
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Dec; 48(6):551-60. PubMed ID: 11148427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the quality of medical records in the Monastir regional hospitals--Tunisia].
Letaief M; Mtiraoui A; Mandhouj O; Ben Salem K; Soltani MS; Bchir A
Tunis Med; 2003 May; 81(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 12934450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Record keeping and change.
Cerney MS
J Natl Assoc Priv Psychiatr Hosp; 1978-1979 Winter; 10(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 10294908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. UB-82 forms offer wealth of information, misinformation.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(38):18-9, 22-9. PubMed ID: 10106206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection and implementation of a bar-code-based record management system in ambulatory care.
Majerowicz AF
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 May; 61(5):28-38. PubMed ID: 10104530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total medical record: an automated medical information system.
Herpok FJ; Hansen JP; Ritter JN; Hammond WE
Med Group Manage; 1979; 26(5):37-40, 46. PubMed ID: 10243968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital selection algorithm for emergency patients.
Okada M; Okada M
J Clin Comput; 1982; 11(3):122-35. PubMed ID: 10278135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health care information systems - the outcomes of the integrated use of health information.
Mäenpää T; Asikainen P; Rostila I; Suominen T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():749-50. PubMed ID: 19592960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation protocol for information system planning.
Schmitz HH
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1984 Jul; 2(7):17-20. PubMed ID: 10267747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
