These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7077189)
1. The effects of two new compensating filters on patient exposure in chiropractic full spine radiography. Merkin JJ; Sportelli L J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1982 Mar; 5(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7077189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dose reduction in panoramic radiography. Orthopantomograph Model OP 3 modified for rare earth intensifying screens. Forsgren L; Julin P Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):225-31. PubMed ID: 6963005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposure reduction and image quality for pantomographic radiography. Tyndall DA; Bedsole SM Radiol Technol; 1987; 59(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3659339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of lead-acrylic compensating filters in chiropractic full spine radiography: a technical report. Buehler MT; Hrejsa AF J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1985 Sep; 8(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 4056627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reduction of doses in teleradiography of the spine. Criteria of radiation protection and studies of dosimetry]. Agati G; Chiecchio A; Rastel Bogin P; Granone A; Neri R; Barboni G Radiol Med; 1985 May; 71(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 4059600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing radiation doses to the breast, thyroid and gonads during diagnostic radiography. Part 2. Measurement of doses to the gonads during radiography of the pelvis. Weatherburn GC Radiography; 1983 Aug; 49(584):195-202. PubMed ID: 6622661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed radiography in scoliosis. Diagnostic information and radiation dose. Jónsson A; Jonsson K; Eklund K; Holje G; Pettersson H Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 7619625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exposure reduction and image quality in orthodontic radiology: a review of the literature. Taylor TS; Ackerman RJ; Hardman PK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Jan; 93(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 3276147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Dosage reduction using intensifying screens in panoramic tomography]. Sewerin I; Solow B Tandlaegebladet; 1984 Oct; 88(17):608-10. PubMed ID: 6596769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [X-ray intensifying screens: their effect on the quality of the image and the degree of irradiation]. Tombak MI; Vlasov PV; Gurvich AM; Gurevich IA; Katomina RV Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (5):80-4. PubMed ID: 6528468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films]. Hofmann T Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the current use of rare-earth screens in the United Kingdom. Russell JG Br J Radiol; 1986 Jun; 59(702):630. PubMed ID: 3708274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reduction of radiation exposure with digital luminescence radiography exemplified by roentgen diagnosis of the pediatric pelvis]. Schedel H; Steger W; Hilbertz T; Zellner A; Fink U; Hidajat N Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Oct; 47(10):293-6. PubMed ID: 7801191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Plasma technology and its use in flat panel digital radiography. Zur A Radiol Manage; 2010; 32(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 22279712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]