189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7077338)
1. Visual evoked potential diagnosis of field defects in patients with chiasmatic and retrochiasmatic lesions.
Onofrj M; Bodis-Wollner I; Mylin L
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1982 Apr; 45(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 7077338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perimetry, visual evoked potentials and visual evoked spectrum array in homonymous hemianopsia.
Celesia GG; Meredith JT; Pluff K
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 6190630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions.
Maitland CG; Aminoff MJ; Kennard C; Hoyt WF
Neurology; 1982 Sep; 32(9):986-91. PubMed ID: 7202169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual evoked potentials with hemifield pattern stimulation. Their use in the diagnosis of retrochiasmatic lesions.
Kuroiwa Y; Celesia GG
Arch Neurol; 1981 Feb; 38(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 7469842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemifield pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in retrochiasmal lesions with homonymous visual field defect.
Maccolini E; Andreoli A; Valdé G; Ghini M; Fulco L
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1986 Aug; 7(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 3759417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical application of the multifocal VEPs.
Betsuin Y; Mashima Y; Ohde H; Inoue R; Oguchi Y
Curr Eye Res; 2001 Jan; 22(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 11402379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia.
Watanabe K; Shinoda K; Kimura I; Mashima Y; Oguchi Y; Ohde H
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 17184719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential in Eyes With Temporal Hemianopia From Chiasmal Compression: Correlation With Standard Automated Perimetry and OCT Findings.
Sousa RM; Oyamada MK; Cunha LP; Monteiro MLR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 58(11):4436-4449. PubMed ID: 28863215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visually evoked responses from the blind field of hemianopic patients.
Sanchez-Lopez J; Pedersini CA; Di Russo F; Cardobi N; Fonte C; Varalta V; Prior M; Smania N; Savazzi S; Marzi CA
Neuropsychologia; 2019 May; 128():127-139. PubMed ID: 28987906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial neglect is associated with increased latencies of visual evoked potentials.
Spinelli D; Burr DC; Morrone MC
Vis Neurosci; 1994; 11(5):909-18. PubMed ID: 7947404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Frequency-doubling perimetry in retrochiasmatic disorders].
Cerio-Ramsden CD; Muñoz Negrete FJ; M Moro JG; Rebolleda G
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Mar; 78(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 12677491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemifield slide from traumatic optic chiasmopathy.
Pula JH; Fischer M; Kattah JC
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1446-7. PubMed ID: 24613428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions.
Klistorner AI; Graham SL; Grigg J; Balachandran C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 89(6):739-44. PubMed ID: 15923511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of multifocal VEP in a child requiring perimetry.
Yukawa E; Matsuura T; Kim YJ; Taketani F; Hara Y
Pediatr Neurol; 2008 May; 38(5):360-2. PubMed ID: 18410854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pattern-onset and OFFset visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of hemianopic field defects.
Marmoy OR; Handley SE; Thompson DA
Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):165-176. PubMed ID: 32691202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Differential diagnosis and etiology of horizontal hemianopsia with reference to arterial hypertension].
Goder G; Comberg U
Ophthalmologica; 1971; 163(5):289-301. PubMed ID: 5168249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of ocular motor reading strategies to the status of adaptation in patients with hemianopic visual field defects.
Schoepf D; Zangemeister WH
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Jun; 682():404-8. PubMed ID: 8323149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram and automated perimetry in eyes with temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression.
Monteiro ML; Cunha LP; Costa-Cunha LV; Maia OO; Oyamada MK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3535-41. PubMed ID: 19264884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perimetry and visual field defects.
Wall M
Handb Clin Neurol; 2021; 178():51-77. PubMed ID: 33832687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
