These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7077988)
1. [Planimetric evaluation of kinetic perimetry with the Goldman perimeter (author's transl)]. Niesel P Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1982 Jan; 180(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 7077988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry. Vonthein R; Rauscher S; Paetzold J; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Hermann A; Sadowski B; Chaumette C; Wild JM; Schiefer U Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17331580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reproducibility of central visual field testing using kinetic or computerized static perimetry (author's transl)]. Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1980 Mar; 176(3):374-84. PubMed ID: 7420997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of semiautomated versus manual Goldmann kinetic perimetry in patients with visually significant glaucoma. Ramirez AM; Chaya CJ; Gordon LK; Giaconi JA J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18344756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss. Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in goldmann kinetic perimetry. Niederhauser S; Mojon DS Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 12566882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Chauhan BC; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)]. Krieglstein GK; Glaab E; Gramer E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter]. Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry]. Qi S; Jiang Y Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quantification of isopters using semiautomated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in glaucoma patients with advanced retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss]. Nowomiejska K; Rejdak R; Zarnowski T; Krapp E; Paetzold J; Schiefer U; Zagórski Z Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):228-30. PubMed ID: 15510508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [White-on-white, blue-on-yellow and blue-on-blue perimetry in normal subjects]. Ayala-Barroso E; Sánchez Méndez M; González Hernández M; González de la Rosa MA Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Nov; 78(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 14648367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and achromatic standard automated perimetry in patients with migraine without aura and controls]. Göbel K; Boyraz M; Schröder A; Erb C Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Aug; 225(8):718-22. PubMed ID: 18712657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma]. Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma]. Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]