73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7078870)
1. Second opinion.
Fribourg S
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 59(2):239-40. PubMed ID: 7078870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Refusal of surgery in an insured population.
Finkel ML; Ruchlin HS
Benefits Q; 1994; 10(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 10171800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with referral to hospital: relationship to expectations, involvement, and information-giving in the consultation.
Greenhow D; Howitt AJ; Kinnersley P
Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Jan; 48(426):911-2. PubMed ID: 9604417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing the involvement of elderly patients in healthcare decision making--the IMPROVE study.
Bradley CP
Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(1):2. PubMed ID: 16945864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Decision support in primary care--a vertical second opinion].
Schaaf M
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(48):2354. PubMed ID: 11766309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Decision support in primary care--a vertical second opinion].
Post D
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(48):2353. PubMed ID: 11766308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer patients seeking a second surgical opinion: results of a study on motives, needs, and expectations.
Mellink WA; Dulmen AM; Wiggers T; Spreeuwenberg PM; Eggermont AM; Bensing JM
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Apr; 21(8):1492-7. PubMed ID: 12697872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Decision support in primary care--a vertical second opinion].
Holdrinet RS
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jul; 145(30):1436-8. PubMed ID: 11503308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical decision-making for successful root canal treatment.
Newton CW
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2002; 81(1):9. PubMed ID: 12078122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Caught between dueling doctors.
Stone B
Newsweek; 2001 May; 137(21):62. PubMed ID: 11383397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in practice: a questionnaire survey of how congruence in attitudes between doctors and patients influences referral decisions.
Carlsen B; Aakvik A; Norheim OF
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 18349435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings.
Entwistle VA; Watt IS; Gilhooly K; Bugge C; Haites N; Walker AE
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Oct; 55(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 15476997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequence analysis: responsiveness of doctors to patient cues during family planning consultations in Mexico.
Kim YM; Kols A; Prammawat S; Rinehart W
Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Jul; 58(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 15950844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law. Winners and choosers.
Print M
Health Serv J; 2003 Oct; 113(5878):29. PubMed ID: 14601544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Helping the patient to decide].
Coumou HC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jul; 145(30):1433-6. PubMed ID: 11503307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough.
Butow P; Devine R; Boyer M; Pendlebury S; Jackson M; Tattersall MH
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Nov; 22(21):4401-9. PubMed ID: 15514382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ten strategies to build partnerships with patients.
Michaud MD; Davis S; Gaines ME
WMJ; 2007 Dec; 106(8):444-6. PubMed ID: 18237063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cancer--the desire for a second opinion is prompted by a need for orientation].
Schmidmaier R
MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Dec; 148(49-50):31-3. PubMed ID: 17619324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The second opinion at its best.
Fleming WH
Nebr Med J; 1978 Sep; 63(9):306-7. PubMed ID: 703896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment decisions: a qualitative study with women with gynaecological cancer.
Markovic M; Manderson L; Quinn M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 16441693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
