These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7080227)

  • 21. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [A national population-based screening program for cervical cancer in Israel, need for re-evaluation].
    Benshushan A; Antebi SO
    Harefuah; 2000 Sep; 139(5-6):217-20. PubMed ID: 11062956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revised screening guidelines reviewed.
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2003 Oct; 17(10):544. PubMed ID: 14608976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Organization and results of cytological study of women in prophylactic gynecologic examinations].
    Mel nik AN; Buval tseva NA
    Vopr Onkol; 1980; 26(7):69-70. PubMed ID: 7405109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cervical cancer screening].
    Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):171-3. PubMed ID: 11831082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
    Reust CE
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervical cancer in Kentucky.
    Friedell GH; Ross FE; Tucker TC; Cook CC; Doering DL; Hilgers R; Milburn CS; Pursell SH; Spires SE; Hinton M; Sorrell C; Edwards MJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2000 Sep; 98(9):398-405. PubMed ID: 11022405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Technological evaluation and screening].
    Jensen OM; Mosbach J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1981 Oct; 143(44):2931-2. PubMed ID: 7324250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Colposcopy may not be clinically relevant.
    Terry RR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1999 Feb; 99(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 10079640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Early detection of female genital carcinoma in Zagreb in the year 1970].
    Ribarić M
    Lijec Vjesn; 1972 May; 94(5):247-52. PubMed ID: 4656988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Should routine screening Papanicolaou smears be done for women older than 65 years?
    Sawaya GF
    Arch Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 164(3):243-5; discussion 247-8. PubMed ID: 14769617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical cancer, Pap smear and HPV testing: an update of the role of organized Pap smear screening and HPV testing.
    Sigurdsson K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jul; 78(6):467-77. PubMed ID: 10376855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Consequences of incorrect interpretation of vaginal smear tests in a screening program].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Poll P; Andersen PK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Apr; 156(17):2594-6. PubMed ID: 8016968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Routine audit of large-scale cervical cancer screening programs.
    Cuzick J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):605-6. PubMed ID: 18445817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why do we go on screening?
    Marsan C
    Pol J Pathol; 2005; 56(4):167-9. PubMed ID: 16477875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Should cervical cancer screening undergo some changes?].
    Boulanger JC
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009; 37(7-8):669-70. PubMed ID: 19577944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Testing for human papillomavirus in cervical cancer screening].
    Kjaer SK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 11831083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The natural history of Pap test screening in a rural population.
    Rosenfeld JA
    Tenn Med; 1998 May; 91(5):179-82. PubMed ID: 9584605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.