These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7081917)

  • 21. Cholecystectomy is safer without drainage: the results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Monson JR; Guillou PJ; Keane FB; Tanner WA; Brennan TG
    Surgery; 1991 Jun; 109(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 2042093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prolonged suction drainage prevents serous wound discharge after cardiac surgery.
    Kockelbergh RC; Harris AM; John RM; Bailey JS; Firmin RK
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jan; 76(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 8117016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collections following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial.
    Monson JR; MacFie J; Irving H; Keane FB; Brennan TG; Tanner WA
    Br J Surg; 1986 Dec; 73(12):993-4. PubMed ID: 3539256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cholecystectomy with and without drainage. A randomized, prospective study of 300 patients.
    Budd DC; Cochran RC; Fouty WJ
    Am J Surg; 1982 Mar; 143(3):307-9. PubMed ID: 7065351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DRAPA trial--closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Čečka F; Loveček M; Jon B; Skalický P; Šubrt Z; Ferko A
    Trials; 2015 May; 16():207. PubMed ID: 25947117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical trial of drainage following cholecystectomy: suction versus static drainage.
    Jha IN; Singh HB; Prasad N
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1986 Nov; 84(11):341-2. PubMed ID: 3295055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cholecystectomy with and without drainage: a prospective randomised study.
    Saad AM; el Hassan AM
    East Afr Med J; 1993 Aug; 70(8):499-501. PubMed ID: 8261970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A controlled trial of drainage after cholecystectomy.
    Gordon AB; Bates T; Fiddian RV
    Br J Surg; 1976 Apr; 63(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 776322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: time to stent or time to drain.
    Pinkas H; Brady PG
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2008 Dec; 7(6):628-32. PubMed ID: 19073409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cholecystectomy with and without intraperitoneal drain.
    Truedson H
    Acta Chir Scand; 1983; 149(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 6613477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Routine drainage following uncomplicated, elective cholecystectomy? A prospective, randomized study].
    Förster R; Schnabel M; Krahl M; Lindlar R; Rothmund M
    Chirurg; 1992 Jul; 63(7):558-62. PubMed ID: 1505264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cholecystectomy without drainage, nasogastric suction, and intravenous fluids.
    Man B; Kraus L; Motovic A
    Am J Surg; 1977 Mar; 133(3):312-4. PubMed ID: 576776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Postoperative suction drainage of the axilla: for how long? Prospective randomised trial.
    Kopelman D; Klemm O; Bahous H; Klein R; Krausz M; Hashmonai M
    Eur J Surg; 1999 Feb; 165(2):117-20; discussion 121-2. PubMed ID: 10192568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter?
    Sánchez-Ortiz R; Madsen LT; Swanson DA; Canfield SE; Wood CG
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 14665885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Drainage after cholecystectomy.
    Chilton CP; Mann CV
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1980 Jan; 62(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 7362191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between intermittent (spring-loaded) and continuous closed suction drainage of orthopedic wounds: a controlled clinical trial.
    Berman AT; Fabiano D; Bosacco SJ; Weiss AA
    Orthopedics; 1990 Mar; 13(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 2179912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Wound drainage versus non-drainage for proximal femoral fractures. A prospective randomised study.
    Tjeenk RM; Peeters MP; van den Ende E; Kastelein GW; Breslau PJ
    Injury; 2005 Jan; 36(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 15589927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Slit drainage versus Redon drainage in a clinical comparison--initial experiences with a new kind of wound drainage system].
    Brandner P; Neis KJ; Hettenbach A; Schmidt W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 May; 51(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 1869010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty].
    Mengal B; Aebi J; Rodriguez A; Lemaire R
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Feb; 87(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11240535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective randomized study of drained and undrained cholecystectomies.
    Locker D; Norwood SH; Torma MJ; Fontenelle LJ
    Am Surg; 1983 Oct; 49(10):528-30. PubMed ID: 6678543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.