These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7082060)

  • 21. Severe dysphagia from an Angelchik prosthesis: futility of routine esophageal testing.
    Demmy TL; Caron NR; Curtis JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1660-1. PubMed ID: 8010825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Angelchik prosthesis revisited.
    Varshney S; Kelly JJ; Branagan G; Somers SS; Kelly JM
    World J Surg; 2002 Jan; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 11898046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigation and outcome of 121 infants and children requiring Nissen fundoplication for the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Fung KP; Seagram G; Pasieka J; Trevenen C; Machida H; Scott B
    Clin Invest Med; 1990 Oct; 13(5):237-46. PubMed ID: 2276217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gastroesophageal fundoplication for reflux in infants and children.
    Follette D; Fonkalsrud EW; Euler A; Ament M
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 Oct; 11(5):757-64. PubMed ID: 993946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Angelchik prosthesis behaves as a fundoplication.
    Lee JR; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Mar; 75(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 8476193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reflux versus dysphagia: an objective evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Morris DL; Jones J; Evans DF; Foster G; Smart H; Gregson R; Amar S; Doran J; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1985 Dec; 72(12):1017-20. PubMed ID: 4084744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sonographic appearance of a migrated Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis in the pelvis.
    Zavareh A; Dubbins P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2009 Sep; 37(7):417-9. PubMed ID: 19536864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. A community experience.
    Smith RS; Chang FC; Hayes KA; deBakker J
    Am J Surg; 1985 Dec; 150(6):735-8. PubMed ID: 4073367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the Nissen fundoplication for treatment of hiatal hernia: use of parietal cell vagotomy without drainage as an adjunctive procedure.
    Bahadorzadeh K; Jordan PH
    Ann Surg; 1975 Apr; 181(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 236737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Appraisal of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis based on clinical and manometric data and pH monitoring.
    de Caestecker JS; Ross HM; Heading RC; Macleod IB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Feb; 34(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiology of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastroesophageal reflux.
    Burhenne LJ; Fratkin LB; Flak B; Burhenne HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 6607635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Successful laparoscopic removal of a migrated Angelchik prosthesis.
    Plaisier PW; Lange JF
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Jun; 14(6):592. PubMed ID: 11287994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in patients with poor esophageal motility or paraesophageal herniation.
    Livingston CD; Jones HL; Askew RE; Victor BE; Askew RE
    Am Surg; 2001 Oct; 67(10):987-91. PubMed ID: 11603559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reoperation for complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Stewart KC; Urschel JD; Hallgren RA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1557-8. PubMed ID: 8010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis: total or partial fundoplication?
    Chrysos E; Tsiaoussis J; Zoras OJ; Athanasakis E; Mantides A; Katsamouris A; Xynos E
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jul; 197(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 12831918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Wyllie JH; Edwards DA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Jul; 67(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 4037629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oesophageal erosion of an Angelchik prosthesis: surgical management using fundoplication.
    Purkiss SF; Argano VA; Kuo J; Lewis CT
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(9):517-8. PubMed ID: 1389267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimal access surgery for gastroesophageal reflux: laparoscopic placement of the Angelchik prosthesis in pigs.
    Berguer R; Stiegmann GV; Yamamoto M; Kim J; Mansour A; Denton J; Norton LW; Angelchik JP
    Surg Endosc; 1991; 5(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 1837188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: Analysis of clinical, procedural and functional factors, associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophagitis.
    Familiari P; Greco S; Gigante G; Calì A; Boškoski I; Onder G; Perri V; Costamagna G
    Dig Endosc; 2016 Jan; 28(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 26173511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.