147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7083133)
1. Combined histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Kiehn J; Heinzel-Wach M
Cancer; 1982 Jul; 50(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 7083133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Sinagowitz E
Pathol Res Pract; 1980; 168(1-3):115-25. PubMed ID: 7433250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear/Nucleolar morphometry and DNA image cytometry as a combined diagnostic tool in pathology of prostatic carcinoma.
Kavantzas N; Agapitos E; Lazaris AC; Pavlopoulos PM; Sofikitis N; Davaris P
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Dec; 20(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 11876548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system].
Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G
Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Malignancy grade and clinical stage T0-T3 in prostate cancer].
Wernert N; Goebbels R; Dhom G
Urologe A; 1986 Jan; 25(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3962046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Histopathological comparison of stage A prostatic adenocarcinoma in Japan and the United States].
Uchida K; Shimazui T; Ohtani M; Akaza H; Koiso K; Nemoto R; Harada M
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jun; 84(6):1119-26. PubMed ID: 8345730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Classification, histological and cytological grading and assessment of regression grading in prostatic carcinomas. A recommendation of the Pathologic-Urological Task Force on Prostatic Carcinoma].
Helpap B; Böcking A; Dhom G; Faul P; Kastendieck H; Leistenschneider W; Müller HA
Pathologe; 1985 Jan; 6(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 3983085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance and outcome of nuclear anaplasia and mitotic index in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
Kır G; Sarbay BC; Gumus E
Urol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):430.e9-430.e16. PubMed ID: 27264167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of WHO and Gleason histologic grading systems in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
Ozdamar SO; Sarikaya S; Yildiz L; Atilla MK; Kandemir B; Yildiz S
Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 8738623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: intraobserver reproducibility of the Mostofi, Gleason and Böcking grading systems.
Cintra ML; Billis A
Int Urol Nephrol; 1991; 23(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 1938244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognostic importance of Gleason grade in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a long-term follow-up study of 648 patients treated with radiation therapy.
Zagars GK; Ayala AG; von Eschenbach AC; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 7836075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Correlation between histologic grading and prognosis of prostatic cancer--comparing the grading system of the Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer with Gleason's grading].
Hioki T; Sugimura Y; Sakurai M; Hayashi N; Tochigi H; Kawamura J; Yatani R
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Aug; 36(8):921-6. PubMed ID: 2239593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.
Helpap B; Ringli D; Tonhauser J; Poser I; Breul J; Gevensleben H; Seifert HH
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Apr; 22(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 26563277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Morphologic and cell kinetic studies of prostate cancers. Contribution to grading].
Helpap B
Urol Int; 1985; 40(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 2983471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of different nuclear morphologic patterns in grading prostatic adenocarcinoma. An expanded model for computer graphic filters.
Minimo C; Galera-Davidson H; Xiao J; Christen R; Fitzpatrick B; Bartels PH; Bibbo M
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1994 Oct; 16(5):307-14. PubMed ID: 7840836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cell kinetic and cytological grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Helpap B
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol; 1981; 393(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 7292980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver agreement in the nuclear grading of primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Nakazato Y; Maeshima AM; Ishikawa Y; Yatabe Y; Fukuoka J; Yokose T; Tomita Y; Minami Y; Asamura H; Tachibana K; Goya T; Noguchi M
J Thorac Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8(6):736-43. PubMed ID: 23676557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Kern WH
Cancer; 1978 May; 41(5):2046-54. PubMed ID: 647639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic grading of primary prostatic cancer: a new approach to an old problem.
Gaeta JF; Asirwatham JE; Miller G; Murphy GP
J Urol; 1980 May; 123(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 6999173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nucleolar grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: light microscopic correlation with disease progression.
Myers RP; Neves RJ; Farrow GM; Utz DC
Prostate; 1982; 3(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 6183650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
