These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. Onset and progression of calcification in porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves implanted as orthotopic mitral valve replacements in juvenile sheep. Schoen FJ; Hirsch D; Bianco RW; Levy RJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1994 Nov; 108(5):880-7. PubMed ID: 7967670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study. Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans. Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Different modes of degeneration in autologous and heterologous heart valve prostheses. Grabenwöger M; Fitzal F; Gross C; Hutschala D; Böck P; Brucke P; Wolner E J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):104-9; discussion 110-1. PubMed ID: 10678382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of anticalcification treatments on bioprosthetic heart valves implanted in sheep. Jones M; Eidbo EE; Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ; Clark RE ASAIO Trans; 1988; 34(4):1027-30. PubMed ID: 3219249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of species, environmental factors, and tissue cellularity on calcification of porcine aortic wall tissue. Meuris B; Ozaki S; Herijgers P; Verbeken E; Flameng W Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):99-105. PubMed ID: 11805957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The failure modes of biological prosthetic heart valves. Butany J; Leask R J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):115-35. PubMed ID: 11921659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves. Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial. Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Inhibition of cusp and aortic wall calcification in ethanol- and aluminum-treated bioprosthetic heart valves in sheep: background, mechanisms, and synergism. Levy RJ; Vyavahare N; Ogle M; Ashworth P; Bianco R; Schoen FJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):209-16; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 12701794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus. Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]