These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7083680)

  • 1. Stress changes in bone secondary to the use of a femoral canal plug with cemented hip replacement.
    Skinner HB; Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Haddad RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Jun; (166):277-83. PubMed ID: 7083680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.
    Pritchett JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 May; (314):156-61. PubMed ID: 7634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The case for cemented hips.
    Johnston RC
    Hip; 1987; ():351-9. PubMed ID: 3818353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement.
    Davey JR; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reinforcement of bone cement around the femoral prosthesis tip by pre-coated wire coil: a human cadaver bone study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 8922261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Custom-made molds that prevent cement extrusion through bone defects.
    Slater RR; Morrison J; Kelley SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Aug; (317):126-30. PubMed ID: 7671466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
    Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A simple technique of removal of femoral cement plug in total hip prosthesis revision].
    Julliard R
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 8761102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an expandable stem total hip replacement system.
    Kummer FJ; Strauss EJ; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2007; 65(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 17581101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology.
    Gorab RS; Covino BM; Borden LS
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 8414428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Otto Aufranc Award Paper. An analysis of femoral prosthesis design: the effects on proximal femur loading.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Pedersen DR
    Hip; 1981; ():111-22. PubMed ID: 7333883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 7602395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symposium on Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Hip. Biomechanics: mutifactorial design choices--an essential compromise?
    Clarke IC
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1982 Oct; 13(4):681-707. PubMed ID: 7145341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case for cementing all femoral components in total hip replacement.
    Harris WH
    Can J Surg; 1995 Feb; 38 Suppl 1():S55-60. PubMed ID: 7874631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.