These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7083803)

  • 1. Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.
    Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 1982 Apr; 14(2):247-79. PubMed ID: 7083803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Gwynne JW
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Dec; 36(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 6535102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of visual and auditory noise on visual choice reaction time in a continuous-flow paradigm.
    Stoffels EJ; van der Molen MW
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jul; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 3405732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Fournier LR; Eriksen CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):538-50. PubMed ID: 2144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Boroughs JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 May; 35(5):451-63. PubMed ID: 6462872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related differences in the processing of redundant visual dimensions.
    Bucur B; Madden DJ; Allen PA
    Psychol Aging; 2005 Sep; 20(3):435-46. PubMed ID: 16248703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of any auditory stimulus on the processing of a visual stimulus single- and dual-tasks conditions.
    Simon JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Aug; 51(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 7136846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what?
    Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redundancy gain and coactivation in bimodal detection: evidence for the preservation of coactive processing in older adults.
    Bucur B; Allen PA; Sanders RE; Ruthruff E; Murphy MD
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2005 Sep; 60(5):P279-82. PubMed ID: 16131623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention.
    Giray M; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Dec; 19(6):1278-91. PubMed ID: 8294892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultradian cyclicity in auditory and visual reaction time during long performance.
    Almirall H; Ferrer R; Sànchez-Turet M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 3399336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial attentional shifts: implications for the role of polysensory mechanisms.
    Buchtel HA; Butter CM
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 3405396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the detection of letters within redundant arrays.
    Johnson NF
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3763365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitation and interference with a separable redundant dimension in stimulus comparison.
    Garner WR
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 3226879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Eriksen CW
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 3405746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 1826309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The limits of selective attention in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Butler B
    Can J Psychol; 1974 Jun; 28(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 4426009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Locus of the redundant-signals effect in bimodal divided attention: a neurophysiological analysis.
    Miller J; Ulrich R; Lamarre Y
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 11414141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks.
    Gondan M; Götze C; Greenlee MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1692-709. PubMed ID: 20675811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coactivation of response initiation processes with redundant signals.
    Maslovat D; Hajj J; Carlsen AN
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 May; 675():7-11. PubMed ID: 29555517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.