131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7083962)
1. Parents' rights to counsel in proceedings to terminate parental rights: factors to consider.
Besharov DJ
Child Welfare; 1982 Apr; 61(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 7083962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parent, child, and the decision to abort: a critique of the Supreme Court's statutory proposal in Bellotti v. Baird.
Watts WW
South Calif Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 52(6):1869-915. PubMed ID: 11665145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rights and the role of family engagement in child welfare: an international treaties perspective on families' rights, parents' rights, and children's rights.
Lenzer G; Gran B
Child Welfare; 2011; 90(4):157-79. PubMed ID: 22413385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parham v. J. R.: "voluntary" commitment of minors to mental institutions.
Tiano LV
Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(1):125-49. PubMed ID: 7435506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
Wardle LD
Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The competent child's preference in clinical medical decisions: a proposal for its consideration.
Mark LB
West State Univ Law Rev; 1983; 11(1):25-58. PubMed ID: 16086470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention.
Obernberger S
Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Termination of parental rights proceedings: legal considerations and practical strategies for parents with psychiatric disabilities and the practitioners who serve them.
Kundra LB; Alexander LB
Psychiatr Rehabil J; 2009; 33(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 19808210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When do parents have the right to refuse medical treatment on behalf of their children?
Coates J; Grierson S
N Z Med J; 2000 Jul; 113(1113):297. PubMed ID: 10935574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn.
King PA
Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Massachusetts high court upholds condom program in public school.
AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Aug; 10(15):1, 8-9. PubMed ID: 11362732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sterilization of minors.
Boynton M
Minn Med; 1994 Jan; 77(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 8127303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Due process and voluntary commitment by parents of juveniles to mental health facilities.
Hodgeman RB
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(1):259-69. PubMed ID: 11658342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Who will take care of my children?].
McGovern TM
Sidahora; 1995; ():28-30. PubMed ID: 11363367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Due process limitations on parental rights to commit children to mental institutions.
Holladay JN
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1977; 48(2):235-66. PubMed ID: 11664712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Permanency planning in the context of parental incarceration: legal issues and recommendations.
Genty PM
Child Welfare; 1998; 77(5):543-59. PubMed ID: 9744073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court refuses to hear appeal of 'hot and sexy' program.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Mar; 11(5):5. PubMed ID: 11363268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Condom availability in the schools: lessons from the courtroom.
Mahler K
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 8777943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
