These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7084861)
21. Effect of clinic related factors on continuation rates of IUDs. Reading AE; Goldstuck ND Contracept Deliv Syst; 1982 Jan; 3(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12264121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The IUD: will its future always be crippled by its past? Farr G Family Plan World; 1993; 3(4):5, 26. PubMed ID: 12288089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interception by post-coital IUD insertion. Van Santen MR; Haspels AA Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jul; 2(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 12278905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. IUDs: current perspectives. Hepburn S Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pelvic abscess in intrauterine device users. Tanir HM; Hassa H; Ozalp S; Kaya M; Oge T Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2005 Mar; 10(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 16036293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Complications of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) use at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin. Jimoh AA Niger J Med; 2004; 13(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 15532225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Health risks of intrauterine contraception (author's transl)]. Keith LG; Berger GS; Edelman DA Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Jun; 11(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 12338737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Paramedic insertion of intrauterine device in a Malaysian family planning clinic. Kwa Siew Kim ; Arshat H; Abdul Jalil AH; Ang Eng Suan ; Suhaimi A Malays J Reprod Health; 1987 Jun; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12269176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1493-5. PubMed ID: 18055754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The intrauterine device: rethinking old paradigms. Morgan KW J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17081937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?]. Forrest JD Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Four case histories with severe genital infections following insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (author's transl)]. Ebert F; Molkentin K Zentralbl Gynakol; 1980; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 7467972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A review of bacteriological culture of removed intrauterine contraceptive devices. Lewis R Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Oct; 24(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 9855713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The decline in popularity of the intrauterine device. A survey of general practitioner attitudes and practices in New South Wales. Weisberg E; Fraser IS; Goss S Med J Aust; 1994 Jan; 160(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8271978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]