These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7085523)

  • 1. Beef cattle breeding à la Jefferson.
    Hohenboken WD
    J Anim Sci; 1982 Mar; 54(3):667-79. PubMed ID: 7085523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimising the proportion of selection candidates measured for feed intake for a beef cattle breeding objective that includes methane emissions.
    Cottle DJ; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Mar; 95(3):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 28380522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
    Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invited review: research contributions from seventy-five years of breeding Line 1 Hereford cattle at Miles City, Montana.
    MacNeil MD
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Aug; 87(8):2489-501. PubMed ID: 19395508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems and possibilities into the next decade involving beef cattle breeding research in the southern region: experiment station herds.
    Franke De
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Oct; 69(10):4229-33. PubMed ID: 1778840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Canalization analysis of birth weight in Bruna dels Pirineus beef cattle.
    Fina M; Ibáñez-Escriche N; Piedrafita J; Casellas J
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3070-8. PubMed ID: 23658344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector.
    Van Eenennaam AL; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):307-20. PubMed ID: 21262975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle.
    Cantalapiedra-Hijar G; Abo-Ismail M; Carstens GE; Guan LL; Hegarty R; Kenny DA; McGee M; Plastow G; Relling A; Ortigues-Marty I
    Animal; 2018 Dec; 12(s2):s321-s335. PubMed ID: 30139392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. QU-GENE: a simulation platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models.
    Podlich DW; Cooper M
    Bioinformatics; 1998; 14(7):632-53. PubMed ID: 9730929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.
    Mota RR; Tempelman RJ; Lopes PS; Aguilar I; Silva FF; Cardoso FF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():3. PubMed ID: 26767704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of adaptation and genotype × environment interactions in tropical beef breeding systems.
    Burrow HM
    Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):729-40. PubMed ID: 22558921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stochastic simulation study on validation of an approximate multitrait model using preadjusted data for prediction of breeding values.
    Lassen J; Sørensen MK; Madsen P; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jun; 90(6):3002-11. PubMed ID: 17517742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle.
    Berry DP; Wall E; Pryce JE
    Animal; 2014 May; 8 Suppl 1():105-21. PubMed ID: 24703258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic associations among average annual productivity, growth traits, and stayability: a parallel between Nelore and composite beef cattle.
    Santana ML; Eler JP; Bignardi AB; Ferraz JB
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jun; 91(6):2566-74. PubMed ID: 23482586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symposium review: Breeding a better cow-Will she be adaptable?
    Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3665-3685. PubMed ID: 29224864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of breeding strategies for polledness in dairy cattle using a newly developed simulation framework for quantitative and Mendelian traits.
    Scheper C; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Dressel H; Swalve H; König S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):50. PubMed ID: 27357942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progress in the molecular and genetic modification breeding of beef cattle in China.
    Tong B; Zhang L; Li GP
    Yi Chuan; 2017 Nov; 39(11):984-1015. PubMed ID: 29254918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Thomsen H; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1628-39. PubMed ID: 18349255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.