These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7085523)

  • 21. Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation.
    Golden BL; Garrick DJ; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(14 Suppl):E3-10. PubMed ID: 19028854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle.
    Lee J; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3406-3414. PubMed ID: 28805929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.
    Boerner V; Johnston DJ; Tier B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):61. PubMed ID: 25927468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methods and consequences of including feed intake and efficiency in genetic selection for multiple-trait merit.
    Barwick SA; Henzell AL; Walmsley BJ; Johnston DJ; Banks RG
    J Anim Sci; 2018 May; 96(5):1600-1616. PubMed ID: 29529227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The accuracies of DNA-based estimates of genetic merit derived from Angus or multibreed beef cattle training populations.
    Weber KL; Drake DJ; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ; Kuehn LA; Thallman RM; Schnabel RD; Snelling WM; Pollak EJ; Van Eenennaam AL
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4191-202. PubMed ID: 22871929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic and economic evaluation of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle breeding schemes.
    Kahi AK; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2021-32. PubMed ID: 16100056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.
    Enns RM; Nicoll GB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3348-57. PubMed ID: 18469047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multistage selection for maximum economic return with an application to beef cattle breeding.
    Xu S; Martin TG; Muir WM
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 7608002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development.
    Bernardo R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Nov; 107(7):1252-6. PubMed ID: 12928779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genomic selection for feed efficiency in dairy cattle.
    Pryce JE; Wales WJ; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF; Hayes BJ
    Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24128704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Illustration of the maternal animal model used for genetic evaluation of beef cattle.
    Crews DH; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1842-8. PubMed ID: 17371795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation.
    Oliveira DP; Lourenco DAL; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Santos DJA; de Araújo Neto FR; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Baldi F; Carvalheiro R; de Camargo GMF; Albuquerque LG; Tonhati H
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Feb; 96(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29365164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for different environments with genotype by environment interaction.
    Mulder HA; Veerkamp RF; Ducro BJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 May; 89(5):1740-52. PubMed ID: 16606745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of genomic selection for age at puberty in a multi-breed population of tropically adapted beef cattle.
    Farah MM; Swan AA; Fortes MR; Fonseca R; Moore SS; Kelly MJ
    Anim Genet; 2016 Feb; 47(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26490440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation.
    Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reciprocal sign epistasis and truncation selection: When is recombination favorable in a pre-breeding program with a selfing species?
    Vagne C; David J; Tavaud M; Fontez B
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():44-54. PubMed ID: 26334476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hot topic: Effect of breeding strategies using genomic information on fitness and health.
    Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Fuerst C; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4600-9. PubMed ID: 22818475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Benefits of cooperation between breeding programs in the presence of genotype by environment interaction.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 May; 89(5):1727-39. PubMed ID: 16606744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic grouping strategies in selection efficiency of composite beef cattle ( × ).
    Petrini J; Pertile SF; Eler JP; Ferraz JB; Mattos EC; Figueiredo LG; Mourão GB
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):541-52. PubMed ID: 26020743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.