123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 708571)
1. Effect of lymphocyte supernatants on the electrophoretic mobility of erythrocytes: significance in cancer diagnosis.
Dyson JE; Corbett PJ
Br J Cancer; 1978 Sep; 38(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 708571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymphocyte supernatants and the electrophoretic mobility of erythrocytes: further experience of cancer diagnosis.
Dyson JE; Watkinson AP; Jones WG; Corbett PJ; Joslin CA
Br J Cancer; 1980 Sep; 42(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 7000116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evidence that electrophoretic-mobility (EM) test is of no value for the diagnosis of cancer in children (author's transl)].
Lasson U; Scherer G; Müller-Ruchholtz W
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1981 Mar; 129(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 6112683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cell electrophoresis for diagnostic purposes. I. Diagnostic value of the electrophoretic mobility test (EMT) for the detection of gynaecological malignancies.
Hoffmann W; Werner W; Steiner R; Kaufmann R
Br J Cancer; 1981 May; 43(5):588-97. PubMed ID: 6166306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the kinetics of the macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) and the tanned sheep erythrocyte electrophoretic mobility (TEEM) tests.
Shenton BK; Jenssen HL; Werner H; Field EJ
J Immunol Methods; 1977; 14(2):123-39. PubMed ID: 138709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between the macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) and the fixed tanned erythrocyte electrophoretic mobility (FTEEM) tests in the detection of cancer.
Harlos JP; Weiss L
Int J Cancer; 1978 Apr; 21(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 78907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The electrophoretic-mobility-(EM) test: a method for discrimination of malignant and non-malignant tumors (author's transl)].
Tautz C; Schneider W; Laier E; Brügmann G
Klin Wochenschr; 1978 Feb; 56(4):175-85. PubMed ID: 75286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Immune diagnosis of malignant diseases. X. Value of the electrophoresis mobility test in the diagnosis of broncho-pulmonary diseases].
Douwes FR
Onkologie; 1978 Apr; 1(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 82241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophoretic mobility test for lymphocyte sensitization using tanned sheep erythrocytes.
Jenssen HL; Shenton BK
Acta Biol Med Ger; 1975; 34(4):K 29-32. PubMed ID: 1237979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The electrophoretic mobility test with myelin basic protein, binding of 125I-MBP to lymphocytes, and gel electrophoresis pattern of supernatant during incubation.
Mross K; Mross B; Wolfrum DI; Kohlschütter A
Res Exp Med (Berl); 1980; 177(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 6160602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Electrophoretic mobility of lymphocytes in multiple myeloma and bronchial cancer].
Ricci C; Cascio G; Alemanno L; Anania A; Gallarate G; Omedè P; Valente E
Minerva Med; 1979 Sep; 70(42):2855-61. PubMed ID: 386169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immunodiagnostics of malignant diseases. II. The electrophoretic mobility test in the diagnosis of gynecological malignancies.
Douwes FR; Hoffmann W; Mross K
Oncology; 1977; 34(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 70771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lymphocyte sensitization in childhood solid tumours and lymphoblastic leukaemia, measured by electrophoretic mobility test.
Lampert F; Nitzschke U; Zwergel T
Br J Cancer; 1977 Jun; 35(6):844-9. PubMed ID: 68784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. KCl carcinoma extracts as tumor antigens in the electrophoretic mobility test: clinical evaluation.
Muhrer KH; Link KH
Cancer Detect Prev; 1983; 6(1-2):101-6. PubMed ID: 6883371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The inhibition of the electrophoretic-mobility-test: an in vitro assay for the estimation of activities in anti-lymphokine and anti-lymphocyte sera (author's transl)].
Werner H; Friemel H; Holzheidt G
Allerg Immunol (Leipz); 1982; 28(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 6214173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Electrophoretic mobility of peripheral lymphocytes and Hodgkin's erythrocytes. Correlation with some clinical, hematological and immunological parameters of the disease].
Tognella S; Mantovani G; Del Giacco GS; Floris C; Manconi PE; Grifoni V
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1975; 54(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 769799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Immunodiagnosis of malignant disease. I. The electrophoresis-mobility test in the diagnosis of bronchial carcinoma (author's transl)].
Douwes FR; Hüttemann U; Mross K
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Mar; 102(12):419-22. PubMed ID: 321201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Macrophage electrophoretic mobility test (MEM) and tanned erythrocyte electrophoretic mobility test (TEEM) for cancer diagnosis (author's transl)].
Zhao BH; Hu JK; Liang JX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1979; 1(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 553795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The macrophage electrophoretic mobility (MEM) test--an investigation of its value as a routine laboratory test in the detection of malignant disease.
Pritchard JA; Sutherland WH; Teasdale C; Whitehead RH; Deeley TJ; Hughes LE
Ann Clin Res; 1978 Apr; 10(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 354473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell partition. A simple test for lymphocyte sensitisation.
Smith JJ; Dickinson JP
Lancet; 1976 Dec; 2(7999):1336-7. PubMed ID: 63807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
