483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7086382)
1. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor.
Kurse J
J Fam Pract; 1982 Jul; 15(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7086382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns.
Garite TJ; Dildy GA; McNamara H; Nageotte MP; Boehm FH; Dellinger EH; Knuppel RA; Porreco RP; Miller HS; Sunderji S; Varner MW; Swedlow DB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 11084540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
Bilar M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal asphyxia: prevention, detection and intervention.
Bertakis KD
Am Fam Physician; 1984 Sep; 30(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 6475703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fetal heart rate during labour: definitions and interpretation].
Martin A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S34-45. PubMed ID: 18191915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whither electronic fetal monitoring?
Sandmire HF
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1130-4. PubMed ID: 2234724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The medical and legal risks of the electronic fetal monitor.
Lent M
Stanford Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 51(4):807-37. PubMed ID: 10557629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update.
Thacker SB; Stroup DF; Peterson HB
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):613-20. PubMed ID: 7675390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor.
Sweha A; Hacker TW; Nuovo J
Am Fam Physician; 1999 May; 59(9):2487-500. PubMed ID: 10323356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic fetal monitoring: what's reassuring?
Berkus MD; Langer O; Samueloff A; Xenakis EM; Field NT
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jan; 78(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 9926886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [-Diagnosis of fetal hypoxia by monitoring during labor-].
Béguin F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1995; 256 Suppl():S50-60. PubMed ID: 8619662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.
Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor.
Shenker L; Post RC; Seiler JS
Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis and management of fetal distress during labor.
Cohen WR; Schifrin BS
Semin Perinatol; 1978 Apr; 2(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 32625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of internal electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on maternal and infant infections in high-risk pregnancies.
Koszalka MF; Haverkamp AD; Orleans M; Murphy J
J Reprod Med; 1982 Oct; 27(10):661-5. PubMed ID: 7175837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
