These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7087776)

  • 1. Cognitive factors in the concurrent differential conditioning of eyelid and skin conductance responses.
    Baer PE; Fuhrer MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Mar; 10(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 7087776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential GSR conditioning accompanied by a two-light prediction task.
    Hunt DP; Daily RF
    J Gen Psychol; 1974 Apr; 90(2d Half):165-77. PubMed ID: 4833495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive processes and the multiple response phenomenon.
    Lockhart RA
    Psychophysiology; 1973 Jan; 10(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 4684226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EYELID CONDITIONING AND CONCOMITANT GSR ACTIVITY.
    MARTIN I
    Behav Res Ther; 1963 Dec; 1():255-65. PubMed ID: 14153353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysiological correlates of classical differential eyelid conditioning among subjects selected on the basis of impulsiveness and anxiety.
    Barratt ES
    Biol Psychiatry; 1971; 3(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 5163818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relation between physiological measures of emotionality and performance in eyelid conditioning.
    RUNQUIST WN; ROSS LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1959 May; 57(5):329-32. PubMed ID: 13654644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of CS duration on trace conditioning of mental retardates.
    Carruthers BC; Lobb H
    Psychol Rep; 1973 Jun; 32(3):1215-9. PubMed ID: 4709817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Latent inhibition as a means of behavior prophylaxis.
    Lubow RE
    Psychol Rep; 1973 Jun; 32(3):1247-52. PubMed ID: 4709821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the distinction between conditioning and pseudoconditioning.
    Burstein KR
    Psychophysiology; 1973 Jan; 10(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 4684233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aversive associative conditioning of prepulses in a startle inhibition paradigm.
    Nees F; Hahn M; Schulz A; Blumenthal TD; Schächinger H
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 19226308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple response measures during classical conditioning.
    Ayers ED; Powell DA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2002 Feb; 114(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 11850037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expectancy and magnitude of reaction to a noxious UCS.
    Epstein S
    Psychophysiology; 1973 Jan; 10(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 4684224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive processes in the differential trace conditioning of electrodermal and vasomotor activity.
    Baer PE; Fuhrer MJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Apr; 84(1):176-8. PubMed ID: 5480919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals.
    Smith MC; Coleman SR; Gormezano I
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Oct; 69(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 5404450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac defense response as a predictor of fear learning.
    López R; Poy R; Pastor MC; Segarra P; Moltó J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 19782707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive processes during differential trace and delayed conditioning of the GSR.
    Baer PE; Fuhrer MJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Sep; 78(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 5682971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive factors in eyelid conditioning.
    Grant DA
    Psychophysiology; 1973 Jan; 10(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 4567501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent measurement of autonomic and cognitive processes in a test of the traditional discriminative control procedure for Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning.
    Furedy JJ; Schiffman K
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Sep; 100(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 4744497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognition and conditioning: effects of masking the CS-UCS contingency on human GSR classical conditioning.
    Dawson ME
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Sep; 85(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 5489485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrodermal responses during appetitive conditioning are sensitive to contingency instruction ambiguity.
    van den Akker K; Nederkoorn C; Jansen A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118():40-47. PubMed ID: 28614704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.