85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7087950)
1. The rationalization for infrequent Pap smears.
Twiggs LB
Minn Med; 1982 Feb; 65(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 7087950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NIH Consensus Development Conference summary. Cervical cancer screening: the Pap smear.
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1981 May; 74(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 7242079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. More Mother's Days.
Zablocki E
Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 10176848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comment on the American Cancer Society recommendations. Preventive Problems of prevention from using the example of cervical cancer].
Ober KG
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1981 May; 123(18):726-8. PubMed ID: 6785619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comment on The American Cancer Society recommendations. Cervix cancer: should preventive intervals be changed?].
Soost HJ
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1981 May; 123(18):728-30. PubMed ID: 6785620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cancer screening in the early post vaccine era.
Waxman AG
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):537-48; vii. PubMed ID: 19061815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for cervical cancer. Pap smears can save lives.
Wong JG; Feussner JR
N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):342-5. PubMed ID: 8350931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pap smear update--the Bethesda (nomenclature) System.
Piper DM
West J Med; 1991 Mar; 154(3):325. PubMed ID: 2028595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer screening among Latinas recently immigrated to the United States.
Fernández-Esquer ME; Cardenas-Turanzas M
Prev Med; 2004 May; 38(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 15066355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The annual cervical Pap smear.
Inhorn SL
Wis Med J; 1986 May; 85(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 3727619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing abnormal Pap smears: comments on two articles.
Buck HW
J Am Coll Health; 1989 Sep; 38(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 2778225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cervical cancer prevention in France: more Pap to screen more?].
Riethmuller D; Levêque J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 May; 38(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 19339123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Annual Pap smears queried.
Roberts RW
Aust Fam Physician; 1988 Oct; 17(10):839. PubMed ID: 3240150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
Suarez L; Pulley L
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The new era of cervical cancer prevention: the end of the Pap smear?
Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):289-90. PubMed ID: 12768631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Pap smear, how often? The gynecologist perspective. The Oncology Committee, Georgia State Obstetrical and Gynecological Society.
J Med Assoc Ga; 1981 Aug; 70(8):557-9. PubMed ID: 7276768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Pap smear: a victim of its own success?
Steigman CK; Vernick JP
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Aug; 34(8):8-14; quiz 14-5. PubMed ID: 12228932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Pap smears.
Loeb RA
Am Fam Physician; 1989 Dec; 40(6):48, 50. PubMed ID: 2589151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
