These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7088166)

  • 1. No NIH ban.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jul; 298(5870):111. PubMed ID: 7088166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH urged to act on germ war.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5867):527. PubMed ID: 7088135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH sees no need for DNA weapons ban.
    Sun M
    Science; 1982 Jul; 217(4555):135. PubMed ID: 11643756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice.
    U.S. National Institutes of Health
    Fed Regist; 1984 Sep; 49(179):36052-60. PubMed ID: 11655750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic experiment by military approved.
    Cohn V; Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11646347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US looks to biological weapons.
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5868):615-6. PubMed ID: 7088146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene cloning 'could further biological warfare.
    Joyce C
    New Sci; 1984 Feb; 101(1397):7. PubMed ID: 11655577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biological defense research: charting a safer course.
    Jacobson JA; Rosenberg BH
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):675-6. PubMed ID: 2664239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicine in defense against biological warfare.
    Huxsoll DL; Parrott CD; Patrick WC
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):677-9. PubMed ID: 2746818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological defense defended.
    Norman C
    Science; 1988 May; 240(4855):981. PubMed ID: 11644306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plan nixes recombinant DNA to make weapons.
    Chem Eng News; 1982 Jun; 60(26):8. PubMed ID: 11650550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research on biological warfare is challenged.
    Cushman JH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Sep; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biotech firms win approval for more open-air tests.
    Joyce C
    New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):4. PubMed ID: 11655646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US biological weapons: protests over US Army lab.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Oct; 317(6036):377. PubMed ID: 11653654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH to review policy of DNA committee.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1984 Jan; 223(4631):35. PubMed ID: 6691133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court hears suit on biowarfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 May; 228(4701):827-8. PubMed ID: 11643758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Petition to amend the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules to establish a Public Policy Advisory Committee. Foundation on Economic Trends, September 18, 1990.
    Hum Gene Ther; 1991; 2(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 1911933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judge blocks biological warfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Jun; 228(4706):1411. PubMed ID: 11643779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
    Wilson DJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Army agrees to new study of biowarfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Feb; 227(4687):614. PubMed ID: 11643708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.