244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7088450)
1. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
Baker RM
Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Pairwuti S
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test].
Broso P; Buffetti G; Sacco A
Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The false negative smear: an instrumental error?
Rubio CA
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):500-1. PubMed ID: 269598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center.
Szarewski A; Curran G; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Kocjan G; Bounds W; Guillebaud J
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 8328239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples.
Boon ME; Zeppa P; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Kok LP
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 1994636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphometric analysis of dysplasia in cervical cone biopsy specimens in cases with false-negative cytology.
Hartman B; Kaplan B; Boone D
Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 68(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 3785796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush.
Crouse BJ; Elliott BA; Nesin N
Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
Stock RJ; Thurmond AI; Passmore A
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
