These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7088556)

  • 1. Ocular defocus, spurious resolution and contrast reversal.
    Smith G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1982; 2(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 7088556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple parametric model of the human ocular modulation transfer function.
    Deeley RJ; Drasdo N; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Jan; 11(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 2034461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative investigation into the effects of pupil diameter and defocus on contrast sensitivity for an extended range of spatial frequencies in natural and homatropinized eyes.
    Kay CD; Morrison JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 3658420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity.
    Strang NC; Atchison DA; Woods RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Sep; 19(5):415-26. PubMed ID: 10768022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of defocus on monkey (Macaca nemestrina) contrast sensitivity: behavioral measurements and predictions.
    Williams RA; Boothe RG
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Feb; 60(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 6846484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of refractive error on detection acuity and resolution acuity in peripheral vision.
    Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Bradley A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Sep; 38(10):2134-43. PubMed ID: 9331277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optical characterization of Bangerter foils.
    Pérez GM; Archer SM; Artal P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 51(1):609-13. PubMed ID: 19643962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limits of spherical blur determined with an adaptive optics mirror.
    Atchison DA; Guo H; Fisher SW
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 May; 29(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 19422562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The optical quality of the monochromatic retinal image as a function of focus.
    Charman WN; Jennings JA
    Br J Physiol Opt; 1976; 31(3):119-34. PubMed ID: 1052436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia.
    Bradley A; Freeman RD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1981 Sep; 21(3):467-76. PubMed ID: 7275532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction.
    Woods RL; Strang NC; Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Nov; 20(6):442-51. PubMed ID: 11127124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of the phase transfer function to visual function and visual quality metrics.
    Sarver EJ; Applegate RA
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):S504-7. PubMed ID: 15523966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optical aberrations in the mouse eye.
    de la Cera EG; Rodríguez G; Llorente L; Schaeffel F; Marcos S
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2546-53. PubMed ID: 16516259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of defocus on the contrast and phase of the retinal image of a sinusoidal grating.
    Walsh G; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Oct; 9(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 2631006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the optical theory of underwater vision in humans.
    Gislén A; Gislén L
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Nov; 21(11):2061-4. PubMed ID: 15535363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive optics simulation of intraocular lenses with modified spherical aberration.
    Piers PA; Fernandez EJ; Manzanera S; Norrby S; Artal P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4601-10. PubMed ID: 15557473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.
    Campbell FW; Kulikowski JJ; Levinson J
    J Physiol; 1966 Nov; 187(2):427-36. PubMed ID: 5972182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings.
    Charman WN
    Br J Physiol Opt; 1979; 33(2):10-20. PubMed ID: 554724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related changes of defocus-specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects.
    Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Fidler V; Geraghty E; Norrby S; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Jul; 20(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 10962698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Method for computing the dimensions of an optical system of a device for determining ocular refraction].
    Miagkikh TN
    Nov Med Tekh; 1977; (3):54-8. PubMed ID: 611452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.