These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7092728)

  • 21. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Review of recent research on the selection of frequency-gain characteristics for hearing aids.
    Lippmann R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1980; 89(5 Pt 2):79-83. PubMed ID: 6786197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2903-13. PubMed ID: 10335639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.
    Sammeth CA; Birman M; Hecox KE
    Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech recognition, loudness, and preference with extended bandwidth hearing aids for adult hearing aid users.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Folkeard P; Glista D; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):780-791. PubMed ID: 32309996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Restoring Perceived Loudness for Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):664-678. PubMed ID: 29210810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution.
    Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 1783226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Laurence RF; Wright D
    Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 4063555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peaks in the frequency response of hearing aids: evaluation of the effects on speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 8729914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.
    Fortune T; Scheller T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss.
    McCreery RW; Alexander J; Brennan MA; Hoover B; Kopun J; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):440-7. PubMed ID: 24535558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
    Rakerd B; Punch J; Hooks W; Amlani A; Vander Velde TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1285-94. PubMed ID: 10599612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 3745682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 3390637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationships among speech threshold, loudness discomfort, comfortable loudness, and PB max in the elderly hearing impaired.
    Beattie RC; Warren VG
    Am J Otol; 1982 Apr; 3(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7081412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.