BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7094293)

  • 1. A multi-stage Gaussian transformation algorithm for clinical laboratory data.
    Boyd JC; Lacher DA
    Clin Chem; 1982 Aug; 28(8):1735-41. PubMed ID: 7094293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of transformation algorithm and nonparametric calculation in determining the reference intervals of some urine constituents and characteristics.
    Soliman SA; Abdel-Hay MH; Tayeb OS; Sulaiman MI
    Clin Chim Acta; 1987 Jun; 166(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 3608203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage transformation systems for normalization of reference distributions evaluated.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1987 Mar; 33(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 3815802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Data transformation and normalization].
    Nishida T
    Rinsho Byori; 2010 Oct; 58(10):990-7. PubMed ID: 21077289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tests for departure from normal in laboratory data.
    Rossing RG; Hillis A; Chou DY
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 83(5):642-6. PubMed ID: 3993630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical appraisal of two Box-Cox formulae for their utility in determining reference intervals by realistic simulation and extensive real-world data analyses.
    Ichihara K; Yamashita T; Kataoka H; Sato S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107820. PubMed ID: 37871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of outliers in reference distributions: performance of Horn's algorithm.
    Solberg HE; Lahti A
    Clin Chem; 2005 Dec; 51(12):2326-32. PubMed ID: 16223885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity and specificity of normality tests and consequences on reference interval accuracy at small sample size: a computer-simulation study.
    Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):648-656. PubMed ID: 27556235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skewness in commingled distributions.
    Maclean CJ; Morton NE; Elston RC; Yee S
    Biometrics; 1976 Sep; 32(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 963179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An appraisal of statistical procedures used in derivation of reference intervals.
    Ichihara K; Boyd JC;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Nov; 48(11):1537-51. PubMed ID: 21062226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different percentages of false-positive results obtained using five methods for the calculation of reference change values based on simulated normal and ln-normal distributions of data.
    Lund F; Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 53(6):692-698. PubMed ID: 27151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of normal ranges of clinical laboratory data.
    Tango T
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(4):335-46. PubMed ID: 3764225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resampling approach for determination of the method for reference interval calculation in clinical laboratory practice.
    Pavlov IY; Wilson AR; Delgado JC
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):1217-22. PubMed ID: 20554803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical treatment of reference values in laboratory medicine: testing the goodness-of-fit of an observed distribution to the Gaussian distribution.
    Solberg HE
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1986; 184():125-32. PubMed ID: 3473610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RefVal: a program implementing the recommendations of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry on the statistical treatment of reference values.
    Solberg HE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1995 Dec; 48(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 8925652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of reference values for lung function tests.
    Dirksen A; Groth S
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1986; 22(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 3730640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Normality test and procedure for calculating skewness and kurtosis].
    Xu DF
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1983 Nov; 17(6):321-3. PubMed ID: 6675977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The multivariate reference range: an alternative interpretation of multi-test profiles.
    Boyd JC; Lacher DA
    Clin Chem; 1982 Feb; 28(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 7055945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the efficacy of procedures to normalize Ex-Gaussian distributions.
    Marmolejo-Ramos F; Cousineau D; Benites L; Maehara R
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1548. PubMed ID: 25709588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond Zar: the use and abuse of classification statistics for otolith chemistry.
    Jones CM; Palmer M; Schaffler JJ
    J Fish Biol; 2017 Feb; 90(2):492-504. PubMed ID: 27325371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.