These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7094293)

  • 1. A multi-stage Gaussian transformation algorithm for clinical laboratory data.
    Boyd JC; Lacher DA
    Clin Chem; 1982 Aug; 28(8):1735-41. PubMed ID: 7094293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of transformation algorithm and nonparametric calculation in determining the reference intervals of some urine constituents and characteristics.
    Soliman SA; Abdel-Hay MH; Tayeb OS; Sulaiman MI
    Clin Chim Acta; 1987 Jun; 166(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 3608203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage transformation systems for normalization of reference distributions evaluated.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1987 Mar; 33(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 3815802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Data transformation and normalization].
    Nishida T
    Rinsho Byori; 2010 Oct; 58(10):990-7. PubMed ID: 21077289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tests for departure from normal in laboratory data.
    Rossing RG; Hillis A; Chou DY
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 83(5):642-6. PubMed ID: 3993630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical appraisal of two Box-Cox formulae for their utility in determining reference intervals by realistic simulation and extensive real-world data analyses.
    Ichihara K; Yamashita T; Kataoka H; Sato S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107820. PubMed ID: 37871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of outliers in reference distributions: performance of Horn's algorithm.
    Solberg HE; Lahti A
    Clin Chem; 2005 Dec; 51(12):2326-32. PubMed ID: 16223885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity and specificity of normality tests and consequences on reference interval accuracy at small sample size: a computer-simulation study.
    Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):648-656. PubMed ID: 27556235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skewness in commingled distributions.
    Maclean CJ; Morton NE; Elston RC; Yee S
    Biometrics; 1976 Sep; 32(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 963179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An appraisal of statistical procedures used in derivation of reference intervals.
    Ichihara K; Boyd JC;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Nov; 48(11):1537-51. PubMed ID: 21062226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different percentages of false-positive results obtained using five methods for the calculation of reference change values based on simulated normal and ln-normal distributions of data.
    Lund F; Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 53(6):692-698. PubMed ID: 27151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of normal ranges of clinical laboratory data.
    Tango T
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(4):335-46. PubMed ID: 3764225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resampling approach for determination of the method for reference interval calculation in clinical laboratory practice.
    Pavlov IY; Wilson AR; Delgado JC
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):1217-22. PubMed ID: 20554803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical treatment of reference values in laboratory medicine: testing the goodness-of-fit of an observed distribution to the Gaussian distribution.
    Solberg HE
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1986; 184():125-32. PubMed ID: 3473610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RefVal: a program implementing the recommendations of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry on the statistical treatment of reference values.
    Solberg HE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1995 Dec; 48(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 8925652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of reference values for lung function tests.
    Dirksen A; Groth S
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1986; 22(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 3730640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Normality test and procedure for calculating skewness and kurtosis].
    Xu DF
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1983 Nov; 17(6):321-3. PubMed ID: 6675977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The multivariate reference range: an alternative interpretation of multi-test profiles.
    Boyd JC; Lacher DA
    Clin Chem; 1982 Feb; 28(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 7055945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the efficacy of procedures to normalize Ex-Gaussian distributions.
    Marmolejo-Ramos F; Cousineau D; Benites L; Maehara R
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1548. PubMed ID: 25709588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond Zar: the use and abuse of classification statistics for otolith chemistry.
    Jones CM; Palmer M; Schaffler JJ
    J Fish Biol; 2017 Feb; 90(2):492-504. PubMed ID: 27325371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.