These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7095222)

  • 1. Irritancy of low concentrations of soap and synthetic detergents as measured by skin water loss.
    Hassing JH; Nater JP; Bleumink E
    Dermatologica; 1982 May; 164(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 7095222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin irritancy of commercially available soap and detergent bars as measured by water vapour loss.
    van der Valk PG; Crijns MC; Nater JP; Bleumink E
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1984; 32(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 6468282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test.
    Lakshmi C; Srinivas CR; Anand CV; Mathew AC
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 18713074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of pH on the production of irritation in a chamber irritation test.
    Murahata RI; Toton-Quinn R; Finkey MB
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):62-6. PubMed ID: 3346410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temperature dependency of skin susceptibility to water and detergents.
    Ohlenschlaeger J; Friberg J; Ramsing D; Agner T
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1996 Jul; 76(4):274-6. PubMed ID: 8869682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irritancy ranking of anionic detergents using one-time occlusive, repeated occlusive and repeated open tests.
    Tupker RA; Bunte EE; Fidler V; Wiechers JW; Coenraads PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jun; 40(6):316-22. PubMed ID: 10385334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toxicity of handcleaners.
    van Ketel WG; Bruynzeel DP; Bezemer PD; Stamhuis HI
    Dermatologica; 1984; 168(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 6698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The pH of commercially available rinse-off products in Sri Lanka and their effect on skin pH.
    Gunathilake HM; Sirimanna GM; Schürer NY
    Ceylon Med J; 2007 Dec; 52(4):125-9. PubMed ID: 18286774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dansyl chloride labelling of stratum corneum: its rapid extraction from skin can predict skin irritation due to surfactants and cleansing products.
    Paye M; Simion FA; Pierard GE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Feb; 30(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 7514520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of the effects on the skin of a classical bar soap and a syndet cleansing bar in normal use conditions and in the soap chamber test.
    Barel AO; Lambrecht R; Clarys P; Morrison BM; Paye M
    Skin Res Technol; 2001 May; 7(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 11393212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test.
    Bornkessel A; Flach M; Arens-Corell M; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15691260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of the cytotoxic and irritant effects of skin cleansing soaps.
    Castanedo-Cázares JP; Cortés-García JD; Cornejo-Guerrero MF; Torres-Álvarez B; Hernández-Blanco D
    Gac Med Mex; 2020; 156(5):418-423. PubMed ID: 33372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin vapour loss as a method for measuring the influence of soaps and detergents on human skin. (Part 1).
    van der Valk PG; Nater JP; Bleumink E
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1983; 31(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 6861646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laundry detergents and skin irritancy--a comprehensive review.
    Crawford C; Zirwas MJ
    Skinmed; 2014; 12(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 24720081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detergent and skin irritation.
    Effendy I; Maibach HI
    Clin Dermatol; 1996; 14(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 8901394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The soap chamber test. A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps.
    Frosch PJ; Kligman AM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1979 Jul; 1(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 500863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for measuring the skin-cleansing effect of surfactants in comparison with skin roughness and compatibility.
    Schrader K; Rohr M
    Clin Dermatol; 1996; 14(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 8901400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cleansing, dehydrating, barrier-damaging and irritating hyperaemising effect of four detergent brands: comparative studies using standardised washing models.
    Gloor M; Wasik B; Gehring W; Grieshaber R; Kleesz P; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Feb; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14731242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.