BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7095668)

  • 1. Normal-mirrored letter recognition, same-different judgment and cerebral dominance.
    Shimizu A; Endo M
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1982; 36(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 7095668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tachistoscopic recognition of normal and mirror images of Kana and Kanji characters.
    Shimizu A; Endo M; Nakamura I
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1983; 37(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6884915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laterality differences in recognition of Japanese and Hangul words by monolinguals and bilinguals.
    Endo M; Shimizu A; Nakamura I
    Cortex; 1981 Oct; 17(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 6174270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does sex influence laterality differences in recognition of visually-presented kana or kanji words?
    Shimizu A; Endo M; Egami M
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1981; 35(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 7343442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reaction-time differences between the left and right hemispheres for face and letter discrimination in children and adults.
    Broman M
    Cortex; 1978 Dec; 14(4):578-91. PubMed ID: 738065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of figural complexity on the identification of Kanji and Kana characters.
    Büssing A; Bruckmann R; Hartje W
    Cortex; 1987 Jun; 23(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 3608526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of perceptual reference frames in visual field asymmetries.
    Robertson LC; Lamb MR
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 3362340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction between lateralization of memory and probe stimulus in the recognition of verbal and spatial visual stimuli.
    Berrini R; Capitani E; Della Sala S; Spinnler H
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 6483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers.
    Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of visual complexity in tachistoscopic recognition of Kanji and Kana symbols by German subjects.
    Hartje W; Hannen P; Willmes K
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(2):297-300. PubMed ID: 3714037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual recognition of mirrored letters and the right hemisphere advantage for mirror-invariant object recognition.
    Harrison MT; Strother L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1494-1499. PubMed ID: 29717412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lateral eyes or lateralized? Hemiretinal and ocular dominance effects on visual field asymmetries for the lexical decision task.
    Church KL; Chiarello C
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Oct; 8(2):227-39. PubMed ID: 3196485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the nature of the left visual field advantage for faces.
    Anderson E; Parkin AJ
    Cortex; 1985 Sep; 21(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 4053630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of learning experiences on the shift of hemispheric functional asymmetry].
    Yoshizaki K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1986 Apr; 57(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 3761761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nature of the task-stimulus interaction in the tachistoscopic recognition of kana and kanji words.
    Sasanuma S; Itoh M; Kobayashi Y; Mori K
    Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 7363073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A longitudinal study of the development of visual field advantage for letter matching.
    Davidoff JB; Done DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 6462425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration.
    Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.