These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment? Bliss TP Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision. Kopolow LE Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The cautious advance on the right to treatment. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Nov; 33(11):895-6. PubMed ID: 7141423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Potential Effects of Hall TS Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. O'Connor v. Donaldson: impact in the states. Clayton T Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 27(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 1261980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry. Kennelly DJ Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment? Linburn GE J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Legal issues in mental health administration. Mills MJ; Cummins BD; Gracey JS Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 6642825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions. Kanter AS Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The United States Supreme Court and mental health law. A retrospective. Perlin ML Med Law; 1985; 4(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4038535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R. Spaulding WJ Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment of the mentally ill: legal advocacy enters the second generation. Rubenstein LS Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Oct; 143(10):1264-9. PubMed ID: 3766789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Attempting to protect patients' rights under a medical model. Steadman HJ Int J Law Psychiatry; 1979; 2(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 521201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Historic Supreme Court decision on the voluntary admission of minors issued. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1979; 3(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 11665050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicine court: Rogers in practice. Veliz J; James WS Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 144(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 3799842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]