These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7096851)

  • 21. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Whither the family and family privacy?
    Jones TR; Peterman L
    Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
    Redding RE
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The legal rights on minors in the health care process I.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1979 Oct; 43(10):669. PubMed ID: 498796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Formal commitment hearings not necessary for children, Supreme Court rulings say.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Sep; 30(9):645, 649. PubMed ID: 468145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention.
    Obernberger S
    Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A chance to be heard: an application of Bellotti v. Baird to the civil commitment of minors.
    Butler KA
    Hastings Law J; 1981 May; 32(5):1285-318. PubMed ID: 11658348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF; Martinez S
    Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Legal regulation of adolescent abortion. Unintended effects.
    Melton GB
    Am Psychol; 1987 Jan; 42(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 3565917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey.
    Siliciano JA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectively and efficiently protecting children in faith healing cases: a proposed statutory revision for state intervention.
    Tavolaro KB
    Med Law; 1991; 10(4):311-25. PubMed ID: 1775003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The National Health Act and refusal of consent to health services by children.
    McQuoid-Mason D
    S Afr Med J; 2006 Jun; 96(6):530-2. PubMed ID: 16841137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.