These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 709774)

  • 1. Effect of preoperative ejection fraction on survival and hemodynamic improvement following aortic valve replacement.
    O'Toole JD; Geiser EA; Reddy PS; Curtiss EI; Landfair RM
    Circulation; 1978 Dec; 58(6):1175-84. PubMed ID: 709774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indices predicting long-term survival after valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation and patients with aortic stenosis.
    Hirshfeld JW; Epstein SE; Roberts AJ; Glancy DL; Morrow AG
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1190-9. PubMed ID: 4279146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impaired left ventricular function in chronic aortic valve disease: survival and function after replacement by Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
    Schwarz F; Flameng W; Langebartels F; Sesto M; Walter P; Schlepper M
    Circulation; 1979 Jul; 60(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 445734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preoperative identification of patients likely to have left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. Participants in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
    Hwang MH; Hammermeister KE; Oprian C; Henderson W; Bousvaros G; Wong M; Miller DC; Folland E; Sethi G
    Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I65-76. PubMed ID: 2670330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [What effect does impaired left ventricular function have on prognosis following prosthetic aortic valve replacement?].
    Schwarz F; Ruffmann K; Olschewski M; Scheurlen H; Storch HH; Saggau W; Kübler W
    Z Kardiol; 1986 Sep; 75(9):516-21. PubMed ID: 3788258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hemodynamic rest and stress studies following implantation of various aortic valve prostheses].
    Horstkotte D; Haerten K; Körfer R; Spiller P; Budde T; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 Aug; 72(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 6624185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Panel discussion: Evaluation of cardiac function for valve replacement].
    J Cardiol Suppl; 1989; 20():5-8. PubMed ID: 2605006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of successful, uncomplicated valve replacement on ventricular hypertrophy, volume, and performance in aortic stenosis and in aortic incompetence.
    Pantely G; Morton M; Rahimtoola SH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Mar; 75(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 147370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative left ventricular wall stress, ejection fraction, and aortic valve gradient as prognostic indicators in aortic valve stenosis.
    Smucker ML; Manning SB; Stuckey TD; Tyson DL; Nygaard TW; Kron IL
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1989 Jul; 17(3):133-43. PubMed ID: 2766342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic studies one year after homograft aortic valve replacement.
    Kennedy JW; Twiss RD; Blackmon JR; Merendino KA
    Circulation; 1968 Apr; 37(4 Suppl):II110-8. PubMed ID: 5646569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre- and postoperative hemodynamic and cineangiocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function in patients with aortic regurgitation.
    Herreman F; Ameur A; de Vernejoul F; Bourgin JH; Gueret P; Guerin F; Degeorges M
    Am Heart J; 1979 Jul; 98(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 453013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preoperative hemodynamics and prognosis in aortic valve replacement].
    Müller-Seydlitz PM; Müller-Binninger E; Jahrmärker H; Klinner W
    Verh Dtsch Ges Kreislaufforsch; 1977; 43():397. PubMed ID: 613667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systolic time intervals in severe aortic valve disease. Changes with surgery and hemodynamic correlations.
    Parisi AF; Salzman SH; Schechter E
    Circulation; 1971 Oct; 44(4):539-47. PubMed ID: 5094137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conduction defects in aortic valve disease.
    Thompson R; Mitchell A; Ahmed M; Towers M; Yacoub M
    Am Heart J; 1979 Jul; 98(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 313146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Haemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement with the Kay-Shiley disc valve.
    Björk VO; Olin C; Aström H
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1970; 4(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 5494663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical valve for patients with small aortic annulus and severe left ventricular hypertrophy.
    Natsuaki M; Itoh T; Tomita S; Naitoh K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jan; 7(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 9502145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.
    Monrad ES; Hess OM; Murakami T; Nonogi H; Corin WJ; Krayenbuehl HP
    Circulation; 1988 Jun; 77(6):1345-55. PubMed ID: 2967128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Assessment of myocardial function].
    Rothlin M; Gattiker K
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1973 Jun; 66(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 4199789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and haemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Björk VO; Holmgren A; Olin C; Ovenfors CO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1971; 5(3):177-91. PubMed ID: 5135701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic changes after valve replacement with Starr-Edwards prostheses.
    Bristow JD; Kremkau EL
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 May; 35(5):716-24. PubMed ID: 1124728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.