BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7101126)

  • 1. Resident selection: applicant selection criteria compared with performance.
    Erlandson EE; Calhoun JG; Barrack FM; Hull AL; Youmans LC; Davis WK; Bartlett RH
    Surgery; 1982 Aug; 92(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 7101126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concordance of surgical clerkship performance and National Board of Medical Examiners Part II subtest scores. A validation model.
    Benenson TF; Stimmel B; Aufses A
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 7245030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the criteria of resident selection committees predict residents' performances?
    Fine PL; Hayward RA
    Acad Med; 1995 Sep; 70(9):834-8. PubMed ID: 7669164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Board of Surgery examinations: can we identify surgery residency applicants and residents who will pass the examinations on the first attempt?
    Shellito JL; Osland JS; Helmer SD; Chang FC
    Am J Surg; 2010 Feb; 199(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 19892313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting improvement on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE).
    Godellas CV; Hauge LS; Huang R
    J Surg Res; 2000 Jun; 91(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10816341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of high-risk residents.
    Bergen PC; Littlefield JH; O'Keefe GE; Rege RV; Anthony TA; Kim LT; Turnage RH
    J Surg Res; 2000 Aug; 92(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 10896828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is it appropriate to use core clerkship grades in the selection of residents?
    Takayama H; Grinsell R; Brock D; Foy H; Pellegrini C; Horvath K
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17084767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, skill testing, and intraoperative assessment.
    Scott DJ; Valentine RJ; Bergen PC; Rege RV; Laycock R; Tesfay ST; Jones DB
    Surgery; 2000 Oct; 128(4):613-22. PubMed ID: 11015095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study habits of surgery residents and performance on American Board of Surgery In-Training examinations.
    Derossis AM; Da Rosa D; Schwartz A; Hauge LS; Bordage G
    Am J Surg; 2004 Sep; 188(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 15450825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design, management, and critical evaluation of a surgical basic/clinical science curriculum: the role of an educational chief resident.
    Gregg SC; Eisenberg D; Duffy AJ; Longo WE
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 18308279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weekly assigned reading and examinations during residency, ABSITE performance, and improved pass rates on the American Board of Surgery Examinations.
    de Virgilio C; Chan T; Kaji A; Miller K
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 19059184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weekly reading assignments and examinations result in sustained improvement in American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores.
    de Virgilio C; Stabile BE
    Am Surg; 2005 Oct; 71(10):830-2. PubMed ID: 16468529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does academic intervention impact ABS qualifying examination results?
    Borman KR
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 17084764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of prior night call status on the American Board of Surgery in-training examination scores: eight years of data from a single institution.
    Minion D; Plymale M; Donnelly M; Endean E
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 18063279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. General surgery versus specialty rotations: a new paradigm in surgery clerkships.
    Sandquist MK; Way DP; Patterson AF; Caniano DA; Arnold MW; Nwomeh BC
    J Surg Res; 2009 May; 153(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 18674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directed postgraduate study result in quantitative improvement in American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores.
    Mahmoud A; Andrus CH; Matolo NM; Ward CC
    Am J Surg; 2006 Jun; 191(6):812-6. PubMed ID: 16720155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Significantly improved American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores associated with weekly assigned reading and preparatory examinations.
    de Virgilio C; Stabile BE; Lewis RJ; Brayack C
    Arch Surg; 2003 Nov; 138(11):1195-7. PubMed ID: 14609866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of programmed textbook review on American Board of Surgery In-service Examination scores.
    Dean RE; Hanni CL; Pyle MJ; Nicholas WR
    Am Surg; 1984 Jul; 50(7):345-9. PubMed ID: 6742617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.