These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7104869)

  • 1. Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays.
    Hammond EJ; Green DW
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Mar; 36(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 7104869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for direct visual access to letter identities.
    Haber RN; Cole RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1980 Dec; 46(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7211436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context effects in letter perception: comparison of two theories.
    Richman HB; Simon HA
    Psychol Rev; 1989 Jul; 96(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 2667013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Searching for a pre-specified target letter in briefly displayed words and unpronounceable non-words.
    Solman RT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1981 Dec; 49(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 7324999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual letter-matching and the time course of visual and acoustic codes.
    Carrasco M; Kinchla RA; Figueroa JG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3245474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthographic and lexical processing of visual letter strings.
    Marmurek HH; Briscoe G
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 7172127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence against the computation of abstract letter identities in visual processing.
    Marmurek HH
    Can J Psychol; 1985 Dec; 39(4):536-45. PubMed ID: 4084859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.
    Paap KR; Newsome SL; McDonald JE; Schvaneveldt RW
    Psychol Rev; 1982 Sep; 89(5):573-94. PubMed ID: 7178333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More about the letter-frequency effect.
    Mason M
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information.
    Avant LL; Thieman AA
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Sep; 13(5):392-404. PubMed ID: 4088049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter and word recognition.
    Massaro DW; Klitzke D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1979 Sep; 43(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 495176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of set size on hemifield asymmetries in letter recognition.
    Miller LK; Butler D
    Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 7363074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A processing division on the recency axis: the selective effects of visual field, match type, and direction of reading on terminal and pre-terminal items in a letter matching task.
    Kirsner K; Dunn JC; Schwartz S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1984 Mar; 55(2):157-78. PubMed ID: 6731003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric asymmetries in a letter classification task with different typefaces.
    Umiltà C; Sava D; Salmaso D
    Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 7363062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guessing instructions, experience with stimuli, and array structure in tachistoscopic letter identification.
    Hershenson M
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Dec; 93(4):657-63. PubMed ID: 7212132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fuzzy logical model of letter identification.
    Oden GC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):336-52. PubMed ID: 528944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium.
    Grainger J; Rey A; Dufau S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Oct; 12(10):381-7. PubMed ID: 18760658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 528961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A longitudinal study of the development of visual field advantage for letter matching.
    Davidoff JB; Done DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 6462425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.