These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7107234)

  • 1. Forced cesareans: the most unkindest cut of all.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):16-7, 45. PubMed ID: 7107234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. She's going to die: the case of Angela C.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 3350646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal versus maternal rights: medical and legal perspectives.
    Bowes WA; Selgestad B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Aug; 58(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 7254733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.
    Finamore EP
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 6638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fetal right to live.
    Leiberman JR; Mazor M; Chaim W; Cohen A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 440657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic implications and medical-legal dilemmas of maternal versus fetal rights.
    Mohaupt SM; Sharma KK
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 9729816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal versus fetal rights--a clinical dilemma.
    Shriner TL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 440658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. But she's not an "inanimate container...".
    Mishkin B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(3):40-2. PubMed ID: 3397279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court ordered obstetric intervention: a commentary.
    Brenner B; Burnet P
    N Z Med J; 1995 Oct; 108(1010):431-2. PubMed ID: 7478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Terminal care and the pregnant woman: ethical reflections on In Re: A.C.
    Tuohey JF
    Pediatrics; 1991 Dec; 88(6):1268-73. PubMed ID: 1956747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court-ordered surgery for the protection of a viable fetus: Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga. 86, 274 S.E.2d 457 (1981).
    Manner RL
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1982; 5(1):125-48. PubMed ID: 11649638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pregnant women as fetal containers.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 3804722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus.
    Meyer KC
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The current judicial interpretation of the 1969 abortion law.
    Dehler D
    Cathol Hosp; 1979; 7(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 10245754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can cesarean section be performed without the woman's consent?
    Lyng K; Syse A; Børdahl PE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Jan; 84(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 15603565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    JAMA; 1988 Jul; 260(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 3379716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.