These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7107234)
41. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner. Garfield H Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision. Lindholm LM Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Psychosis and pregnancy: some new ethical and legal dilemmas for the physician. Dal Pozzo EE; Marsh FH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 156(2):425-7. PubMed ID: 3826178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment. Cherry AL Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers. Bloche MG Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn. King PA Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The abortion arena: recent activity. Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Crain CA Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. When pregnant patients refuse interventions. Tauer CA AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Rights and duties of the fetus. Pediatric contribution to the resolution of moral dilemmas in the prenatal medical practice]. Gold F; Laugier J J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(6):603-5. PubMed ID: 1430904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. At law. Transferring the ethical hot potato. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Feb; 17(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 3557940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Legal position of the embryo and of the newborn infant. A legal-medical analysis]. Oehmichen M; Staak M Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1986 Jan; 111(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 3940839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Dangers for pregnant women in the work place. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1985 Jan; 312(3):164-5. PubMed ID: 3965934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]