These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7107234)

  • 41. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner.
    Garfield H
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
    Lindholm LM
    Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ethical issues in fetal surgery.
    Murray TH
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Jun; 70(6):6-10. PubMed ID: 10271259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Psychosis and pregnancy: some new ethical and legal dilemmas for the physician.
    Dal Pozzo EE; Marsh FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 156(2):425-7. PubMed ID: 3826178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
    Cherry AL
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
    Bloche MG
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn.
    King PA
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The abortion arena: recent activity.
    Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ
    Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Crain CA
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
    Tauer CA
    AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Maternal rights, fetal harms.
    Strong C; Kinlaw K
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(3):21; discussion 22-3. PubMed ID: 1885293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.
    Holcomb WL; Appleton SF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 79(3):477-8; author reply 478-9. PubMed ID: 1738535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Court-ordered obstetrical interventions.
    Kolder VE; Gallagher J; Parsons MT
    N Engl J Med; 1987 May; 316(19):1192-6. PubMed ID: 3574370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Rights and duties of the fetus. Pediatric contribution to the resolution of moral dilemmas in the prenatal medical practice].
    Gold F; Laugier J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(6):603-5. PubMed ID: 1430904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Review of 200 Cesareans].
    León Sisniega DC
    Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit; 1973 Mar; 21(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 4732497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. At law. Transferring the ethical hot potato.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Feb; 17(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 3557940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Legal position of the embryo and of the newborn infant. A legal-medical analysis].
    Oehmichen M; Staak M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1986 Jan; 111(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 3940839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Court-ordered cesarean poses ethical questions.
    NAACOG Newsl; 1988 Feb; 15(2):1, 5. PubMed ID: 3126394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dangers for pregnant women in the work place.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Jan; 312(3):164-5. PubMed ID: 3965934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.