1581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7107237)
1. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
Segers MC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When does personhood begin?
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 6680701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment.
Westfall D
Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Webster and the politics of abortion.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
Glendon MA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinton repeals antiabortion policies as activists map out new strategies.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Feb; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioethical catch-22: the moratorium on federal funding of fetal tissue transplantation research and the NIH revitalization amendments.
Maroney HM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():485-519. PubMed ID: 10126947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Religion, morality and politics: the abortion debate].
Ladriere P
Rev Fr Sociol; 1982; 23(3):417-54. PubMed ID: 12339249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
Morgan RG
Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics.
Tatalovich R; Daynes BW
Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. FOCA, funding on center stage to test new dynamic in abortion politics.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jan; (1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unborn children as constitutional persons.
Roden GJ
Issues Law Med; 2010; 25(3):185-273. PubMed ID: 20443281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion 1980: the debate continues.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
