236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7107239)
41. Get to the point! Philosophical bioethics and the struggle to remain relevant.
Takala T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Apr; 24(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 25719350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Challenging norms in bioethics--helping others to find their voice.
DeCoster B
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):9-11. PubMed ID: 18759174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Reflections on morality & medicine: bioethics after two decades.
Morison RS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Apr; 11(2):8-12. PubMed ID: 6940853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A philosophic preface to morals in medicine.
Romanell P
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1974 Jan; 50(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 4521392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Triangular reflective equilibrium: a conscience-based method for bioethical deliberation.
Barilan YM; Brusa M
Bioethics; 2011 Jul; 25(6):304-19. PubMed ID: 20132193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. 'Tell us what you want to do, and we'll tell you how to do it ethically'--academic bioethics: routinely ideological and occasionally corrupt.
Epstein M
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Aug; 8(8):63-5. PubMed ID: 18802871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Joseph Fletcher's situation ethics, once again.
Taylor R
Free Inq; 1995; 15(4):47-9. PubMed ID: 11660178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Common-sense morality.
Brock D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(6):19-21. PubMed ID: 2283281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Rethinking Moral Expertise.
Priaulx N; Weinel M; Wrigley A
Health Care Anal; 2016 Dec; 24(4):393-406. PubMed ID: 25103422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A legacy of Osler. Teaching clinical ethics at the bedside.
Siegler M
JAMA; 1978 Mar; 239(10):951-6. PubMed ID: 628040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. In defence of medical ethics.
Kottow MH
J Med Ethics; 1999 Aug; 25(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 10461599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Ethics, law, and medicine: today's crossroads.
Lee PP
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1986; 49(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3081919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Applying Applied Ethics through ethics consulting.
Moore W
Transfus Apher Sci; 2010 Apr; 42(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 20227344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. From species ethics to social concerns: Habermas's critique of "liberal eugenics" evaluated.
Árnason V
Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Oct; 35(5):353-67. PubMed ID: 25234409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Are moral philosophers moral experts?
Gesang B
Bioethics; 2010 May; 24(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 20394108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Rehabilitation: disability ethics versus Peter Singer.
McPherson GW; Sobsey D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Aug; 84(8):1246-8. PubMed ID: 12917869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Ethics and Experts. 3. Ethicists, critics and expertise.
Wikler D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 7107232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Help from philosophy: responding to the animal rights challenge.
Parker J
FASEB J; 1994 Apr; 8(6):375-7. PubMed ID: 8168687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The characteristics of a valid "empirical" slippery-slope argument.
Ozar D
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 1463886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. When philosophers shoot from the hip: a report from America.
Rachels J
Bioethics; 1991 Jan; 5(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 11650949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
