These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7109201)

  • 21. Changing rates and indications for cesarean sections at a community hospital from 1972 to 1979.
    Sehgal NN
    J Community Health; 1981; 7(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 7320229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(14):887-92. PubMed ID: 6472401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Feb; 132(3):253-6, 259. PubMed ID: 3967160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The rising cesarean section rate: can it safely be reversed?
    Minkoff HL; Schwarz RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 7393501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of physician characteristics on the cesarean birth rate.
    Berkowitz GS; Fiarman GS; Mojica MA; Bauman J; de Regt RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 161(1):146-9. PubMed ID: 2750795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
    Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    CMAJ; 1986 Jun; 134(12):1348-52. PubMed ID: 3708486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The demise of vaginal operative obstetrics: a suggested plan for its revival.
    Seiler JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):710-3. PubMed ID: 2314791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cesarean section in Ontario: practice patterns and responses to hypothetical cases.
    Barnsley JM; Vayda E; Lomas J; Enkin MW; Pierre KD; Anderson GM; MacKinnon BA
    Can J Surg; 1990 Apr; 33(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 2268812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
    Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
    CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Managing the primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Branch DW; Silver RM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 55(4):946-60. PubMed ID: 23090464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].
    Bouillin D; Fournier G; Gueye A; Diadhiou F; Cissé CT
    Sante; 1994; 4(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 7850191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Practice environment is associated with obstetric decision making regarding abnormal labor.
    Carpenter MW; Soule D; Yates WT; Meeker CI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 3627632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.
    Notzon FC; Cnattingius S; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Taffel S; Irgens L; Daltveit AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 8116703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reversing the upward trend in the cesarean section rate.
    Peter J; Amir W; Eitan P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Jun; 25(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3609425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High cesarean section rate: a new perspective.
    Porreco RP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 4038791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
    Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cesarean section: recent trends.
    Martin MC; Moyyen S; Gelfand M
    Can J Surg; 1982 Jan; 25(1):85-7, 91. PubMed ID: 7055772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.