These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7109201)

  • 41. Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for cesarean delivery in developing countries.
    Stanton C; Ronsmans C;
    Birth; 2008 Sep; 35(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 18844646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Incidence of and factors associated with primary cesarean section in Benin (Africa)].
    Fourn L; Alihonou E; Seguin L; Ducic S
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8134665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.
    Ryan K; Schnatz P; Greene J; Curry S
    Conn Med; 2005 Mar; 69(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 15861999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    CMAJ; 1989 Nov; 141(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 2804827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Primary cesarean section: a critical analysis.
    Ott WJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Dec; 58(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 7312234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.
    Stafford RS
    Am J Public Health; 1990 Mar; 80(3):313-5. PubMed ID: 2305912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia: risk factors in nulliparas.
    Thorp JA; Eckert LO; Ang MS; Johnston DA; Peaceman AM; Parisi VM
    Am J Perinatol; 1991 Nov; 8(6):402-10. PubMed ID: 1814306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of physician characteristics on clinical behavior: cesarean section in New York State.
    Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA
    Soc Sci Med; 1993 Nov; 37(10):1251-60. PubMed ID: 8272903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The cesarean delivery rate can be safely reduced in a developing country.
    de Muylder X; Thiery M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):360-4. PubMed ID: 2304708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. When is primary cesarean appropriate: maternal and obstetrical indications.
    Tita AT
    Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):324-7. PubMed ID: 23009963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Specialty differences in primary cesarean section rates in a rural hospital.
    Hueston WJ
    Fam Pract Res J; 1992 Sep; 12(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 1414428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates.
    O'Driscoll K; Foley M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 6823339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Temporal variation in rates of cesarean section for dystocia: does "convenience" play a role?
    Fraser W; Usher RH; McLean FH; Bossenberry C; Thomson ME; Kramer MS; Smith LP; Power H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 156(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 3826164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California.
    Spetz J; Smith MW; Ennis SF
    Med Care; 2001 Jun; 39(6):536-50. PubMed ID: 11404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cesarean section: a contemporary assessment.
    Evrard JR; Gold EM; Cahill TF
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Apr; 24(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 7373598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Physician bias in cesarean section.
    Goodlin R
    JAMA; 1983 Feb; 249(8):1005-6. PubMed ID: 6823052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Can the number of cesarean sections be reduced without risk? An analysis of rates and indications in a university clinic.
    Poisson-Salomon AS; Breart G; Maillard F; Rabarison Y; Chavigny C; Sureau C; Rumeau-Rouquette C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1986 Sep; 22(5-6):297-307. PubMed ID: 3770279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evolution of the indications for cesarean section. Results of a retrospective study.
    Gentile G; Formelli G; Rinaldi AM; Palma S; Pelusi G
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1991; 18(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 1914206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.