These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7110069)

  • 1. A physical statistics theory for detectability of target signals in noisy images. I. Mathematical background, empirical review, and development of theory.
    Moran PR
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(3):401-13. PubMed ID: 7110069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.
    Ohara K; Chan HP; Doi K; Giger ML; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 3724689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images.
    Wagner RF
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 882063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detectability in computed tomographic images.
    Hanson KM
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 492079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
    Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detectability of low-contrast features in computed tomography.
    Warren RC
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Jan; 29(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6701188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds.
    Bochud FO; Valley JF; Verdun FR; Hessler C; Schnyder P
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1365-70. PubMed ID: 10435539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images.
    Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Sayre J; Tai YC; Hoffman EJ
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Apr; 41(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 10768578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions.
    Pollard BJ; Chawla AS; Delong DM; Hashimoto N; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2204-13. PubMed ID: 18649449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative detection of single molecules in fluorescence microscopy images.
    Peterson EM; Harris JM
    Anal Chem; 2010 Jan; 82(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 19957961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging.
    Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Muller S; Ebrahimi M; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051910. PubMed ID: 23635280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studies of performance of antiscatter grids in digital radiography: effect on signal-to-noise ratio.
    Chan HP; Lam KL; Wu YZ
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 2215411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of the limit of detection using information theory measures.
    Fonollosa J; Vergara A; Huerta R; Marco S
    Anal Chim Acta; 2014 Jan; 810():1-9. PubMed ID: 24439498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
    Burgess AE
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast.
    Giger ML; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 4000077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple model combining quantum noise and anatomical variation in radiographs.
    Ruttimann UE; Webber RL
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 6700553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical detection of resolved targets in background clutter using optical/infrared imagery.
    Stotts LB; Hoff LE
    Appl Opt; 2014 Aug; 53(22):5042-52. PubMed ID: 25090338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.