These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7110087)
1. Soft tissues image latitude (STIL) of radiographic imaging systems. Rao GU Med Phys; 1982; 9(4):563-5. PubMed ID: 7110087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality and the clinical radiographic examination. Vyborny CJ Radiographics; 1997; 17(2):479-98. PubMed ID: 9084085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The information spectrum as a measure of radiographic image quality and system performance. Kanamori H; Matsumoto M Phys Med Biol; 1984 Apr; 29(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 6718485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Measurement of the modulation transmission function of radiographic generator systems]. Angerstein W; Stargardt A Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1968; 9(6):783-91. PubMed ID: 5714079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Geometric and Trigonometric Principles to Simplify Axial and Tangential Projections. Sanders J Radiol Technol; 2020 Mar; 91(4):385-388. PubMed ID: 32102865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The central problem in the study of radiographic image quality. Rossmann K; Wiley BE Radiology; 1970 Jul; 96(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 5420393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Geometric blur and distribution of intensity in a roentgen picture field]. Elsass A; Fenner E; Friedel R; Schnitger H Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1971 Dec; 115(6):822-7. PubMed ID: 5167735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation. Busch HP; Faulkner K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of the input to radiographic imaging systems. Rossmann K; Moseley RD Radiology; 1969 Feb; 92(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 5765929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Special introduction to concepts referring to the quality of radiographic pictures]. Schott O Rontgenpraxis; 1969 Jan; 22(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 5801165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Management of radiographic technics]. Fan Y Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi; 1984 Nov; 18(4):307-9. PubMed ID: 6242306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a radiographic imaging system with a microfocal spot x-ray tube. The usefulness of three- to fivefold magnification. Hollander BA; Hilal SK; Seaman WB Radiology; 1972 Jun; 103(3):667-74. PubMed ID: 5022966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of decreased developer activity on patient exposure. Burns CB; Turner GW Radiol Technol; 1983; 54(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 6878667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Roentgen spectrometric and roentgen dosimetric measurements of beam quality for soft tissue radiography]. Kyser K Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972 Jun; 116(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 4340404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Assessment of the quality of radiographic medical films and chemicals for photochemical treatment]. Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG; Kalashnikova LN Med Tekh; 2001; (6):31-4. PubMed ID: 11837193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The main trends and prospects of using electronic-computer technology and mathematical methods in clinical roentgenology]. KishkovskiÄ AN; Kuznetsov SV Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR; 1989; (2):83-7. PubMed ID: 2711750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]