These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

30 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7111560)

  • 1. Choice of immediate versus delayed reinforcement and depression.
    O'Hara MW; Rehm LP
    Psychol Rep; 1982 Jun; 50(3 Pt 1):925-6. PubMed ID: 7111560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dysphoric mood and preference for immediate versus delayed monetary reinforcement.
    Gaynor ST; Thomas AP; Lawrence PS
    Psychol Rep; 1999 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1281-93. PubMed ID: 10477948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-control and the preference for delayed reinforcement an example in brain injury.
    Dixon MR; Horner MJ; Guercio J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 14596579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choice with initial and terminal link reinforcement: an alternative self-control paradigm.
    Peters HL; Hunt M; Harper DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 14709117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of reinforcement schedules on rats' choice behavior in extinction.
    Huang IN; Krukar JD; Miles SP
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Apr; 119(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 1506847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of ratio reinforcement schedules on choice behavior.
    Huang IN; Melvin JN
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 2313283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Seip KM; Fitzsimmons KS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17071019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference for a segmented schedule using a brief S+ stimulus correlated with a great delay reduction in humans.
    Alessandri J; Molet M; Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2010 Sep; 85(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 20558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete-trials schedule: the effect of deprivation level.
    Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jan; 44(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1546183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-control: an application of the generalized matching law.
    Dziadosz T; Tustin RD
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 May; 86(6):614-20. PubMed ID: 7102736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
    Wogar MA; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats: variable vs. fixed schedules of reinforcement.
    Orduña V; García A; Hong E
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):465-9. PubMed ID: 20060441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human choice on concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules.
    Silberberg A; Thomas JR; Berendzen N
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 1774545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From recurrent choice to skill learning: a reinforcement-learning model.
    Fu WT; Anderson JR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):184-206. PubMed ID: 16719650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ADHD and delay aversion: the influence of non-temporal stimulation on choice for delayed rewards.
    Antrop I; Stock P; Verté S; Wiersema JR; Baeyens D; Roeyers H
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1152-8. PubMed ID: 17076754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Conners J; Wallace MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 10201108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-assessment exposure to schedule-correlated stimuli affects choice responding for tasks.
    Kelley ME; Shamlian K; Lomas JE; Pabico RS
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 21232917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a lag differential reinforcement contingency to increase varied selections of classroom activities.
    Cammilleri AP; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 15898480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.