139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7113926)
1. Efficacy of enforcement in an industrial hearing conservation program.
Hager WL; Hoyle ER; Hermann ER
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1982 Jun; 43(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 7113926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
Savell JF; Toothman EH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
Lusk SL
AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
Gosztonyi RE
J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in hearing protector usage in American manufacturing from 1972 to 1989.
Davis RR; Sieber WK
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Oct; 59(10):715-22. PubMed ID: 9794069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Engineering measures can muffle hazards heard in noisy work areas.
Rekus JF
Occup Health Saf; 1993 Sep; 62(9):82-9. PubMed ID: 8414376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Industrial hearing conservation.
Glorig A
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):609-21. PubMed ID: 471506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise exposure and hearing conservation in U.S. coal mines--a surveillance report.
Joy GJ; Middendorf PJ
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jan; 4(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 17162478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The application of positive practice overcorrection to the use of hearing protection.
Sadler OW; Montgomery GM
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1982 Jun; 43(6):451-4. PubMed ID: 7113925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occupational hearing conservation.
Osguthorpe JD; Klein AJ
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 24(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 1857619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of long term use of hearing protectors in industrial noise.
Nilsson R; Lindgren F
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):204-11. PubMed ID: 6939090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hearing conservation: implementing and evaluating a program.
Harrison RK
AAOHN J; 1989 Apr; 37(4):107-11. PubMed ID: 2518840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise-induced hearing loss and symphony orchestra musicians: risk factors, effects, and management.
Teie PU
Md Med J; 1998 Jan; 47(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9448410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of continuous monitoring in a hearing conservation program.
Michael K; Tougaw E; Wilkinson R
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):195-9. PubMed ID: 21368445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noise-induced hearing loss.
McReynolds MC
Air Med J; 2005; 24(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 15741953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States.
Dobie RA
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18469718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
